A Web of Lies: Captured Nations

The Taking: By Those Who Believe themselves Superior

Charlie Reid’s Warning for Australia

In 2021, I visited an elderly man, (Ninjitsu) Charlie Reid, who had an urgent warning for the people. This encounter proved significant. To piece together The Great Taking—a Master Plan—to control everything. Through a web of lies, designed to capture people, nations, and the world.

My mistake was sharing my plans. My car was sabotaged. Turning what should have been a 20-hour journey to South Australia, into one that stretched over days. I slept on roadsides in unknown places. Determined to keep my promise to an old man. Eventually, I arrived in the bushland outside Ceduna.

I had the honour of being around real aboriginal leaders—humble, quiet, and sincere. Those of few words. Yet, when they spoke, their wise words, are insightful.

When you know real aboriginal leaders, you understand their commitment to the truth. They speak with honesty. It makes sense—hunter-gatherer groups had to listen to their leaders and trust them, or they would not have survived.

I don’t know how, though Mr Reid understood that this was a worldwide plot. He told me, "you are going to tell this story—not just for Australia, but for the world."

The injustice he suffered within a system designed to support Aboriginal Australia was unfathomable.

The native title corporation Mr. Reid founded was taken over by fake claimers. These imposters employed underhanded, criminal bullying tactics—going so far as to falsely imprison him.

“Pascoe from Canberra.”

Mr Reid expressed alarm about: known “gammon” fake, Pascoe from Canberra.

It took me years to fully uncover what lay behind the refusal to hold fake claimers accountable for their provable criminal conduct. This failure, coupled with the media and government promotion of fake aboriginal grifter lies exposed a sinister agenda.

I will unveil a covert arsenal of deception—an array of tactics pulled directly from the spy toolkit—driving a secretive process, operating behind closed doors and concealed beneath its own cryptic system of numbers, symbols, and language.

At its core lies a calculated effort to manipulate laws and governance through fabricated history—a weaponised form of historical disinformation, narrative control, and psychological operations (psyops). Powerful entities—including Five Eyes, governments, the media, other influential organisations and individuals—are not merely distorting the past; they are systematically reshaping the nation’s legal foundations, policy decisions, and geopolitical standing to serve hidden agendas. This is not just manipulation; it is an existential threat to Australia's sovereignty and future.

What I uncovered was not just a distortion of history—it was a calculated, high-level operation orchestrated from the nation's capital, weaponising disinformation to reshape Australia's national identity. At its core lies the fabricated assertion that Aboriginal people engaged in farming across hundreds of distinct 'First Nations'—a deliberate falsehood engineered to justify sweeping changes in governance, land claims, and historical narratives. This is not just revisionism; it is a strategic assault on the nation's legal foundations, designed to redefine ownership, control, and power. If left unchecked, this deception threatens to rewrite Australia's future entirely.

Mr. Reid knew the truth of his history; he honoured his resilient ancestors—nomadic hunter-gatherers. Small family groups of fewer than 100 traveled across the land. They did not have national borders and nations. Any suggestion to the contrary is contrived rubbish.

Mr Reid spoke of "gammon" Pascoe’s lies—his claims that a 200-year conspiracy has concealed the "truth" that Aboriginal people were farmers and had invented bread before the Egyptians and democracy before the Greeks.¹

Aboriginal people say Pascoe is “gammon,” fake. They observe closely, knowing when lied too. There is nothing worse for an Aboriginal to be known as a lier.

Aboriginal people did not develop farming, it is impossible Australia has no native animals with hooves.

Mr Reid laughed when referring to Pascoe’s myths, saying, ‘What did a wallaby pulled the plough.’

With frustration, asked, ‘Why are these lies spread everywhere, media, government, even at schools?

What is going on?”

He insisted, “You are a lawyer—we need you to get to the bottom of this.”

They want to strip all of us of our inheritance—our birth right as Australians.

Break up nations

See more here

In the “First Nations” maps of Australia, North America, and New Zealand, I recognised the malevolent undertone woven into this invented history. Once accepted, this falsehood becomes a tool for dismantling nations.²

What is at stake is Australia’s future as a country. They have taken over our governance. We no longer have a say in our laws; they are dictated by international influence, agendas, and treaties, that the Australian people, were not consulted on. The same process is unfolding globally. A secret creeping coup (secret coup).

International interference gave rise to the global Indigenous rights movement, shaping what has become the Aboriginal Industrial Complex. Among its devices is communal land title—land that no Australian can privately own—which is projected to cover 80% of the country within five years.

Decisions made by the United Nations, alongside legal precedents set both domestically and internationally, now pose a direct threat to Australia's sovereignty. Those driving this agenda have leveraged blackmail to exert control over our representatives. Coupled with a false flag event to push the next UN directives into Australian law—an initiative designed to cripple the nation’s economy. If successful, this manoeuvre could have led to debt entrapment, forcing financial dependency on World Bank and IMF loans and ultimately pressuring Australia into surrendering its autonomy. Worse still, a declaration embedded within Australian law could pave the way for separate First Nations governance, fracturing the nation’s unity and sealing its fate.

With implications that could be far-reaching, and irreversible.

Australians often take their autonomy for granted, but it is now being contested. We must become more aware of the issues, the key players, and be prepared to defend our country.

This is not new, the breakup of nations has been a strategic tool for the British Empire to maintain control. The partitioning of lands—such as India, Ireland, and the Middle East, including Palestine—created lasting instability that persists to this day.³

“Greater Good” Con

This strategy has not ceased. The same British ruling class remains behind it, employing the same tactics—this time using the United Nations as a cover to obscure its involvement under the “greater good” con.

The idea of global governance is openly discussed in Victorian England, from its conception the United Nations was always a British idea.⁴

Ironically, the underlying scheme appears to be re-colonisation for total control—an effort to establish a feudal Empire 2.0.⁵

Royal agent Nugget Coombs dedicated his life to this insidious agenda. He left London to implement in the Reserve (Central) Bank of Australia, after which he went on to become the first head of Aboriginal Affairs in Canberra. Where he introduced native communal title and Aboriginal self-determination—a right that, under international law, can include succession, leading to the break up of Australia into First Nations.⁶

Coombs assumed leadership of Aboriginal Australia and set about implementing communal land title across the country.

British banker Coombs's interest in aboriginal affairs reveals a clear agenda—to introduce communal land ownership for the benefit of his British handlers. Since no Australian can privately own communal native title land, the Crown retains the power to reclaim control over national assets using their constructed phoney title.

Why would a London banker take such a keen interest in Aboriginal affairs—someone whose priorities lie in the wealth of nations, control of resources, financial dominance, and global markets? What influence does this hold, and more critically, what agenda is being orchestrated in secret? This is not mere curiosity or benevolence; it is a calculated move—one designed to reshape land ownership, dictate policy, and consolidate power under foreign interests. This interference could fundamentally alter Australia’s sovereignty, entangling the nation in a web of economic subjugation and legislative control.

At the London School of Economics, Coombs studied under one of the most influential Marxist thinkers of the 20th century.

Then it clicked—Coombs was not just a London banker but a key operative within a secret international cartel, an orchestrated network seeking to dismantle sovereign nations to seize their resources and wealth.

Coombs openly described himself as part of an exclusive fraternity—a freemasonry of central bankers. In a revealing admission, he stated, 'Those who practice [central banking] often feel themselves to be members of an international freemasonry network,' a system led by the head of the Bank of England, Montague Norman, appointed by the British Monarch. This is no mere financial system—it is a mechanism of control, engineered to entrench foreign dominance over Australia’s future.⁷

Montague Norman played a crucial role in facilitating Adolf Hitler’s rise to power. Documents reveal six months before Britain declared war on Nazi Germany, the Bank of England transferred £5.6 million worth of gold to Hitler—gold that belonged to another country.⁸

Now, as then, the British ruling class remains at the helm of global operations, colluding with noble elites worldwide to dictate the course of nations. For decades, they have orchestrated movements from the shadows—guiding Nazism, communism, and widespread subversion as instruments of control. As their influence is finally dragged into the open, the concealed truth emerges: this is not merely manipulation but a calculated, global criminal conspiracy with far-reaching consequences for Australia's sovereignty and future.⁹

Enemy Combatants

In the clip below, subversive insider Pascoe openly boasts about his role in an orchestrated deception—brazenly admitting to the vast scale of psychological warfare used to rewrite a nation's history. With unsettling confidence, he details the coordination of covert influence operations designed to shape public perception, manipulate national identity, and suppress dissent. These tactics manufacture false legitimacy, creating a mechanism to justify laws that directly endanger the lives of everyday Australians. This is not merely historical distortion; it is a calculated assault on Australia’s sovereignty, engineered to entrench control and subjugate the nation under a fabricated narrative.

To seize control of the nation, they require fake Aboriginals—subversive insider traitors—operatives in a silent, creeping coup. They infiltrate Aboriginal communities, deploying intimidation tactics to bully, stalk, and harass those who dare to object or expose their fraud. Their mission is clear: silence Aboriginal voices, suppress all Australians, and systematically rewrite history to sever our connection to the land.

Mr Reid’s case exposes the dire consequences of allowing fake claimer subversives like Pascoe to infiltrate positions of influence—positions that grant them power over both the Australian people and the land itself. If left unchallenged, their grip on Native Title will expand unchecked, consuming 80% of the continent within five years. This is not just a legal maneuver—it is a calculated land seizure, engineered to redefine ownership, dismantle sovereignty, and entrench control in the hands of those rewriting history for their own agenda. The stakes could not be higher.

Resource Theft

Historically, the British Empire systematically fragmented nations, ensuring their resources could be extracted while preventing unified resistance—an enduring strategy still deployed today.

Britain drained wealth from its colonies through exploitative policies and monopolized industries, leveraging excessive taxation and resource extraction to leave nations economically crippled and permanently dependent.

This is not just historical interference; it is an ongoing assault on Australia’s sovereignty, operating under the guise of the greater good con while serving hidden agendas. In the 1960s, Prince Philip founded the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) as an extension of his World Wildlife Fund (WWF). Bankrolled by Rio Tinto—an entity deeply entwined with the British royal family—the ACF became instrumental in engineering subversive, doomsday-driven environmental and Aboriginal movements, manufacturing crises to justify control over land, resources, and governance.¹⁰

Why would a mining corporation funnel money into an environmental and Aboriginal 'charity'?

Australia ranks among the ten richest nations in natural resources, yet a carefully orchestrated Royal coup ensured we do not own our mineral wealth. Instead, royalty rates remain deliberately suppressed—set as low as 2 to 10%.

By contrast, nations that retain sovereignty over their own resources secure up to 80% in royalties, reinvesting in their economies and securing their future. Australia, however, has been manoeuvred into a system designed for exploitation, where foreign interests reap the rewards while everyday Australians are left with nothing. This is not just economic mismanagement—it is strategic asset stripping, engineered to weaken the nation and consolidate control where it truly matters.¹¹

Australia’s ability to defend itself from foreign takeover has been deliberately weakened—stripped of control over its own wealth and resources. This vulnerability is no accident; it is a calculated warfare strategy perfected by the British Empire to keep nations in check, ensuring they remain dependent and exploitable.

In the 1970s, Rex Connor, Minister for Minerals and Energy, sought to reclaim Australia’s rightful control over its mineral resources through his ambitious 'Buy Back the Farm' plan. He exposed royal-owned Rio Tinto and multinational corporations that had long plundered Australia for 'pennies on the dollar.' But the Royals would not allow it. They intervened, orchestrating a coup to dismantle Connor’s efforts, crushing Australia’s chance to secure its own future.

Today, the betrayal continues. Most of the profits generated from Australia's vast resources are siphoned offshore—hidden away in British tax havens, designed by the ruling class to hoard their wealth while leaving the nation exposed, defenceless, and financially shackled.¹²

Australia’s mining industry is now 86% foreign-owned, ensuring that the vast majority of its profits are siphoned offshore. Despite its immense economic significance, it contributes less than 6% of total government revenue when factoring in royalties and taxes—a staggering imbalance that leaves the nation exposed.¹³

These plundered resource profits stifle national prosperity, preventing vital infrastructure projects from being funded and crippling long-term economic stability. The consequences trickle down to every Australian. As royalty revenues dwindle, the government increasingly shifts the burden onto personal taxation, forcing everyday citizens to bear costs that could have been covered by our royalties—if only we retained ownership of our vast mineral wealth.

Without these critical royalty funds, Australia’s leaders are left short-sighted, increasingly vulnerable to foreign control, and easily manipulated by external forces. This is not mere financial mismanagement—it is a calculated dependency, deliberately engineered to hollow out the nation’s sovereignty. As Australia’s wealth is siphoned offshore, its ability to defend its economic future is systematically eroded, leaving the country exposed to domination, indebtedness, and irreversible decline.

The Native Title Con

British royal agent Nugget Coombs orchestrated the Native Title deception—a mechanism that grants Aboriginal people no voice, no agency, and no real control over their own land. Instead—fake Aboriginals—speak in their place, wielding authority that was never theirs to claim.

This old fella saw it for what it was. Native Title offers no path to homeownership; in truth, no Australian can legally own it. By 2030, it is projected to cover 80% of the country, leaving every one of us in the same powerless position as this elder—stripped of any say over our land, our future.

Native Title was designed not to empower but to bypass protective laws under the guise of serving the "greater good." In reality, it is a vehicle for control. Fake claimers have silenced Mr. Reid and countless others like him—Aboriginal voices erased, replaced by imposters enforcing an agenda.

Mr. Reid fought back. He demanded to read BHP’s documents before signing, refusing to be manipulated. The response was swift and brutal. Fake Aboriginals had Mr. Reid forcibly detained in a psychiatric facility for days. While he was locked away, they stole his Native Title corporation’s common seal, shut out the elders, and signed the documents without his consent.

Only then did I fully grasp his grave concerns about Canberra’s Bruce Pascoe—his relentless warnings about the systematic deception unfolding before us.

This proud elder died broken, never seeing justice.

Yet, despite the deliberate fraud erasing his heritage, Mr. Reid did not blame everyday Australians for the lies. He knew where the deception came from—the ruling class, orchestrating it all from the shadows.

Still, he held onto something deeper. He believed we are one people. As this elder so powerfully stated, "While our skin may be different, we all share the same red blood in our veins."

His words remind us that we stand together.

The Engineered Collapse: A British Empire Strategy

Historically, the British Empire has dismantled governance systems, ensuring control remains in the hands of ruling-class intermediaries loyal to colonial rule—a ruthless strategy still deployed today.¹⁴

The mechanisms for destabilisation are precise: psychological warfare, fabricated history, and false flag operations. Over time, international institutions have been weaponised, crafting deceptive instruments such as the so-called Sustainable Development Agenda—none more insidious than those imposed upon Indigenous peoples worldwide.

Today, this strategy unfolds under the guise of self-determination for Indigenous populations. In reality, ruling-class-controlled subversives—fake Aboriginals—function as enemy combatants, executing a silent coup.

To implement a new global system of control, the existing one must first be dismantled. Consider the implications: imagine the unchecked tyranny of the COVID-era becoming permanent. The pandemic proved how easily safeguards protecting everyday citizens from abuses of power could be suspended without question.¹⁵

The recent Juukan false flag operation was a calculated manoeuvre. It provided justification for imposing the crippling UN Heritage Act—a governance framework designed to paralyze economic activity. The goal? To drive Australia into distress and collapse, paving the way for expanded UN-controlled governance authority while sterilizing resource deposits for future extraction by select foreign corporations.

Juukan’s fabricated crisis was engineered to introduce a UN Indigenous governance model, one designed to replace representative government with a system of global control—a fake Indigenous voice dividing nations into regions, each primed for total conquest.¹⁶

This is the grave danger of invented history and cultural distortion.

Pascoe’s fabrications are not merely academic errors; they are strategic misinformation. His claims lack any historical, archaeological, or logical foundation. Pre-European Australia had no native hooved livestock—elements vital to the technological progress that enabled the transition from hunter-gathering to modern agriculture and infrastructure.

Pascoe’s absurd, fabricated world would be laughable—if it were not so maliciously weaponized.

And yet, this alabaster English ruling-class imposter is lauded by the compromised and ideological zealots—those who believe the ends justify the means, regardless of the destruction they unleash upon the nation.

Pascoe Claims 33 identities

In the clip below, Pascoe dismisses the truth with calculated deception, condescendingly claiming that people are merely using me for an agenda—mocking the fight for accountability by pretending to “feel sorry” for me.

Pascoe lies brazenly on camera, shamelessly misleading a public audience. He declares, 'No Aboriginal person ever approached me about my false claims of Aboriginality,' knowing full well that many have.

I have personally been asked for help by numerous individuals, including a Victorian Aboriginal group that wrote to Andrew Bolt, urgently seeking to expose Pascoe’s fraudulent claims. One of their elders—a respected leader who won Elder of the Year in Victoria—confided that they had been fighting for years to stop Pascoe. She pleaded with me to act on their behalf, desperate for justice.

A Yuin elder also challenged Pascoe directly, calling out his fraudulent claims. Pascoe responded not with accountability, but with bullying and harassment, seeking to silence dissent through intimidation. The elder begged me for support in standing against him.

Even in 2008, my own mother—an Aboriginal professor of history—called and wrote to Bruce Pascoe herself, confronting him and asking why he was lying about his Aboriginal identity. She was not alone. Many Aboriginal people have exposed Pascoe’s fraud.

Yet, he continues the deception, enabled by the compromised ruling class who shield him from accountability while Aboriginal voices are ignored, silenced, and erased.

This is not merely dishonesty—it is a calculated betrayal, a war against truth, identity, and history.

Newspaper articles spanning from 1988 to 2021 have been meticulously compiled and are available for review. The findings expose a staggering deception—within this period, Pascoe claimed 33 different identities, shifting his narrative to suit the moment, evading scrutiny, and manipulating public perception.

This pattern is not incidental—it is deliberate, calculated, and designed to embed a fabricated legacy into the national consciousness. As the evidence mounts, the scale of this fraud becomes undeniable.

See Pascoe’s 33 identities here

Pascoe is not only a proven fake claimer—his outrageous lies, systematically propagated by our so-called ‘rulers,’ are a deliberate act of manipulation designed to dismantle the nation from within.

His historical falsehoods are more than deception; they constitute psychological warfare, embedded into school curricula, indoctrinating young minds. This insidious distortion is cruel—separating children from each other, from the truth, and from their country, their home. The rewriting of history is not a mere oversight; it is part of a calculated plot so vast that fully grasping its betrayal will be difficult.

But the deeper question remains—why?

Why did influential figures—university heads, government department leaders, politicians from across the spectrum, and major corporations—actively endorse these falsehoods? What motive drove them to elevate this deception, ensuring that dissent was crushed before it could gain ground?

Far more troubling is the coordinated effort to silence respected scholars and Aboriginal elders—those who dared to speak the truth, expose the fraud, and defend history. The attacks against them were not random; they were precise, orchestrated, and relentless.

In seeking to understand why these lies were being aggressively championed by the media and those in positions of power across the nation, I uncovered something far more malevolent—an agenda designed not just to mislead, but to control.

Was Bruce Pascoe’s advocacy for the UN governance mechanism simply another deception? Or was it a key component of an international plan engineered to destabilise Australia entirely?¹⁷

The implications are staggering—and the urgency to expose them has never been greater.

The UN’s Loophole: A Global Strategy for Destabilisation

There is a reason why UN rejected a formal definition of Indigenous peoples, it provides fake claimers—enemy combatants with the loophole for conquest.¹⁸

The United Nations deliberately rejected a formal definition of Indigenous peoples, leaving a glaring loophole that empowers fake claimers—enemy combatants—who infiltrate governance to destabilise nations from within. Under this newly devised UN “Indigenous” governance model, these imposters would hold lawful authority over resource management, education, government institutions, and media laws engineered to suppress dissent.

Where we are all forbidden from exposing fake Aboriginals, compromised rulers, or any fabricated narratives—a system deliberately structured to prevent scrutiny, ensuring deception remains unchecked.

These frauds bypass proof with a single excuse: “My family was displaced, we have no documents.” A statement designed to evade verification. Yet in Australia, this claim collapses under scrutiny. Aboriginal Australians are one of the most extensively documented groups in modern history. Entire institutions house detailed records, and the government maintains vast archives that provide legal access to individuals seeking information on their ancestry.

If an Aboriginal ancestor exists in this country, they can be traced—the documentation is there.

Aboriginal Australians have a deeply embedded family connection matrix, one that cannot be forged. Their ability to identify frauds—with remarkable accuracy—is a testament to their historical and cultural continuity. These connections are not bureaucratic constructs but lived relationships, defining their ties to one another and to the land itself.

They are warm, understanding, and forgiving, often welcoming outsiders into the fold—but this generosity does not extend to deception. Their disgust at the systematic fraud being carried out in their name is absolute.

This is not just misrepresentation—it is calculated warfare against a people, a culture, and a nation.

The Rising Tide of Fraud

Aboriginal people—and those who work alongside them—know that something is deeply wrong. The late Sydney University anthropologist Gaynor Macdonald, who dedicated her career to working with Aboriginal Australians, warned of the alarming scale of deception unfolding. She spoke candidly about how grassroots Aboriginal people are being overwhelmed by what she described as a “tidal wave” of f claimants—imposters who manipulate identity for personal and political gain.

This flood of deception is not a coincidence—it is a coordinated movement, designed to displace authentic Aboriginal voices, ensuring that imposters speak in their place while executing agendas that serve ruling-class interests, not Aboriginal communities.

The consequences are devastating—Aboriginal heritage distorted, land rights manipulated, and governance structures dismantled to entrench external control.

Those who see the truth must act before the damage becomes irreversible.

The Global Crisis of Fraudulent Identity Theft

Professor Victoria Grieves, an Aboriginal historian, warns that the phenomenon of false identity claims has reached a crisis point—a deception so pervasive that it is now widely recognized by Indigenous communities worldwide. She does not mince words: "The time is ripe to address this huge issue and avert a new wave of genocide."

Grieves’ international research project is uncovering the systematic infiltration of Indigenous communities in the United States, Canada, and Finland—a coordinated effort where fake claimers weaponise identity to secure influence, financial gain, and control over policy-making.

The devastating consequences of this deception are evident in the case of Aboriginal man Rupert Williams. A fraudulent claimant outright stole his family history, fabricating connections so absurd that a woman 11 years younger than him falsely claimed he was her grandfather.

This grifter exploited Aboriginal identity to defraud taxpayers, securing a senior government position designated for Aboriginal representation and accumulating over $100,000 in grants within just one year.

Williams refused to stay silent. He attempted to expose the fraud, only to face legal retaliation—threatened under Section 18C racial speech laws, a legislative weapon wielded to silence those who challenge deception and demand accountability.

This is not an isolated case—it is a global operation, where fabricated identities are institutionally protected, Aboriginal voices systematically silenced, and the very foundation of Indigenous representation dismantled from within.¹⁹

The Treaty Deception

States and territories are pushing treaty-making processes while simultaneously legitimising fraudulent Aboriginal identity claims. How can any treaty hold true legitimacy when it is infiltrated by imposters—fake claimers executing an agenda that serves ruling-class interests rather than Aboriginal communities?

Our compromised government wilfully ignores the escalating invasion of these frauds into Aboriginal Australia, turning a blind eye to their unchecked manipulation of land rights, governance, and public perception.

The consequences of this deception are already unfolding—Australians face the very real risk of suffering the same fraud and exploitation that Mr. Reid endured. His fight for truth, his demand for accountability, was met with brutal retaliation—his voice suppressed, his authority stripped, his identity violated by imposters who systematically erased the real Aboriginal leadership.

This is not just negligence—it is strategic betrayal, paving the way for a governance structure controlled by deception. If left unchallenged, the very foundation of sovereignty will crumble, replaced by a system that operates on lies, suppression, and external control.

The Global Plot Is Underway

The engineered erosion of sovereignty is happening now, executed by insider traitors—fraudulent Aboriginal grifters like Pascoe—who twist history to manipulate land claims, ensuring vast areas of Australia are locked down.

These tactics are not accidental; they are deliberate weapons, deployed to paralyze economic activity and dismantle private property rights. Under this system, multinational corporations seize control, while Australians lose authority over their own land.

Mr. Reid saw the truth clearly—he called Native Title what it is: a con, a mechanism designed to grant foreign entities unrestricted access to Australia’s resources under the guise of Aboriginal rights. But his people were never meant to benefit—only to be exploited as cover for this vast deception.

This is not just policy manipulation; it is an outright assault on Australia’s future. If left unchallenged, the consequences will be catastrophic.

The communal land title con. Land that no Australian can own.

I spent years researching who was behind the communal land title. Land that no Australian can own. How was it implemented? Why have communal land title and Aboriginal affairs consistently failed for over 50 years, despite receiving billions.

Why has a domestic issue become an international concern. Why is foreign influence shaping Aboriginal affairs. Why are external foreign entities dictating policies to the government, without consulting those directly affected on the ground?

I have concluded: The Aboriginal industrial complex was established as a device for a secret creeping coup. Countries have been infiltrated with subversive enemy combatants who use, abuse and sabotaged Indigenous peoples of the world to control nations.

This agenda is not new—the ruling class has plundered nations of their wealth for centuries. As in India, estimated to almost $65 USD trillion in wealth stolen over 200 years.²⁰

Africa producer of 680 metric tons of gold in 2021 holding 40% of the worlds reserves, yet remains impoverished and deliberately dependent on foreign aid.²¹

The ruling class and king want to strip the Commonwealth colonies wealth built up over 2 centuries.²²

The British brutally subjugated its commonwealth subjects, convicts, the poor and disenfranchised such as the Irish with cruel systematic sabotage, along with the Aboriginal people. Knowing they would use their oppression and crimes against the Indigenous peoples of the world later for shaming nations into relinquishing their sovereignty and autonomy for global pillage.

When I met with Mr Reid and heard his evidence.It became clear why communal Native land title, UN devices, fake claimers and fake history is important for the taking of land, to control all resources. It circumvents domestic legal protections, justifying actions under international obligations with claims they serve, ‘the greater good” of indigenous communities worldwide.

They were using Aboriginal Australia as the scapegoat in a global secret creeping coup.

Their goal is clear—ensure we have nothing so they can take everything.

Divide to Conquer. Indigenous is key to the Master Plan.

Charles III declared war: the global control masterplan is unfolding before us

A hidden war.

As Sun Tzu proclaimed, ‘Know your enemy, and you will win a hundred battles.’

The global indigenous scapegoat device

Unveiling the global indigenous scapegoat device, to divide, deflect attention, to hide their hand in, the crime of the century.

My life has been immersed in Aboriginal Australia with over 2 decades of investigation into Australian history, law and politics. I studied and worked in law, in the media and as an independent advisor to Prime Ministers in aboriginal affairs.

When I called out child abuse and corruption, I was shut down. I became a maligned whistle-blower. Something was profoundly wrong. We are in an all-encompassing assault, a total war on humanity.

Charles III demands a "war-like footing" and the launch of a "vast military-style campaign" to mobilise every resource to cull his inferior subjects.

There are extreme weakness on our enemies side. They need to silence truth tellers. After more than 50 years of planning, this great taking con could all come tumbling down. ‘Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall, and all the king's horses (resources) and men could not put him together again’. Charles III is Humpty, on a wall of secrecy, built on sand. His weakness, our opportunity, he must keep things secret to win.

The outcome of this war depends on whether secrecy holds.

Secrecy allows for maintaining control, manipulating narratives, and executing military strategies with precision.

The British Empire has historically relied on secrecy as a strategic tool in warfare. Using deception, intelligence operations to preserve influence and authority.²³

When it wasn’t destroying history outright the British state was weaving a complex web of secrecy to disguise its activities.

Charles III's success depends on the following remaining secret:

Secret Army

London, the capital of bloodthirsty corporate mercenary armies. Charles III is likely amongst the wealthiest on the planet and capable of summoning a private-sector army at will.

During the Iraq War, up to 50% of combatants were corporate mercenaries rising to 70% in Afghanistan. Only 10% of forces were contracted during World War II.²⁴

The British ruling class has facilitated, compromised governments that have systematically defunded defence forces since the end of World War II.

These corporate mercenary armies, devoid of allegiance to any nation, people, are available for hire. Ready to commit atrocities that loyal defence forces refuse. The Royal family has been directly linked—through militant Non-Government Organisations (NGOs) like the WWF—to their deployment, contributing to the deaths of millions in the developing world. There is hope, many mercenaries have been wiped out in the Ukraine proxy war.

Secret Records

Today's understanding of the British Empire has been shaped by state secrecy and the destruction of historical records.²⁵

The Royal family's power, influence, and wealth remain concealed behind laws designed to prevent public scrutiny of their vast corporate holdings and how they wield power over their subjects.

They control all official government documents related to their spending and abuses of power. Records are kept under their lock and key, stored within their sprawling thousand-room castle complex or destroyed.

Commonwealth institution are subject to transparency laws meant to keep power in check. This does not apply to the Royals operating in secret—shielded from accountability. Their hold on these records suggests their criminal conduct is far worse than can be proven. ²⁶

Secret Criminal Network

The public remains in the dark about the extent of their meetings with organised crime figures, sex offenders, mafia, dictators and heads of corporate mercenary armies who plan human genocides.

They deliberately obscure their influence, ensuring the public remains unaware of the orchestrated machinations behind a managed decline, driven by a global blackmail network. Is this why the King surrounds himself with child abusers, criminals, and shady billionaires—to orchestrate vast blackmail operations? Is it all designed to ensure that decision-makers worldwide enforce foreign influence directives within domestic law?

These acts of treason threaten to dismantle nations, fracture families and undermine our future.

Secret Wealth

Charles III is likely amongst the richest people in the world, alongside his relatives who make up the global nobility, it becomes clear how he can summon a private-sector army, tasked with replacing the public sector.

Their power, influence and wealth are hidden behinds laws which prevent the public from finding out about the Royal’s vast corporate ownership. ²⁷

No other public body has this level of secrecy, other than the security services. Tens of thousands of official documents from the UK and around the Commonwealth are hidden away in the royal 'family' archive, making sure the public can't see what the late Queen, Charles and the rest of the family have been up to²⁸

We know from leaks that King Charles is a major shareholder of multinational corporations like Rio Tinto.²⁹

See more here

How could the Royals not possess vast sums of hidden wealth, given their control, colonisation, and conquest of the world over the past 500 years? Is this why the Royal family fights so hard to conceal their fortune? It makes no sense—unless they need to hide the fact that they are among the wealthiest in the world.

Hidden Influence

Did they need to obscure their influence after World War I? They were the hidden hand behind the Communist revolution in Russia. The same was true in World War II I

f not for the transfer of gold by the Royal-appointed head of the Bank of England, the broke and tyrannical Nazi regime—enabled by a false flag operation—would never have been able to launch its military campaign.

Not our king Charles’s, Lifetime Quest

With more than 50 years of scheming Charles III wields significant influence. His reach extends deeply into every aspect of life, business, and government, transcending politics, national borders and religion.

Charles III’s lifetime quest was launched in 1971, aiming to control the environment, and every living thing on the planet. This initiative served as a mechanism for exerting influence and reshaping the laws of every country. It is no coincidence that, in the 1970s, the United Nations made the environment its focal point.

Today, the United Nations, in alignment with Charles’s plans, has successfully embedded its policy dictates into the laws of nearly every nation.

Charles III’s master plan: “is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.”

Is this the divine right of kings?

We live in a world shaped by a new form of feudalism—governed by “environmental governance,” driven by corporate interests and compromised decision-makers. This system of corporate feudalism integrates seamlessly into the twenty-first century.³⁰

Not our king Charles’s, master plan is a type of corporate feudalism which will fundamentally alter life for every person on Earth. Culling, inferior humans—under a system where every bit of consumption is measured against productivity to determine whether who lives.

Charles’s numerous doomsday predictions have ever materialised. He has made public threats for over 50 years, yet the mainstream media refuses to cover his negative influence on the planet.

After spending so much time orchestrating a master plan, why wouldn’t he seek to control the media? Without warnings, the public is left unaware, ensuring that resistance comes too late.

They use psychological warfare tactics to divide us, and to demoralise us, so we don’t fight back.

Not our king Charles, wields immense power.

As the ruler of the Commonwealth, including the authority to remove elected governments. His agent, the Governor General, must approve bills before they become law in Australia.

Despite occupying just 0.16% of the world’s landmass, the United Kingdom has managed to exert global dominance—leveraging a concealed network of influence, secret fraternities, and blackmail to control decision-makers, monopolise critical assets and shape financial systems.

Yet this is not enough for the Commonwealth’s Master and Commander, who presides over 23% of the world, a vast share of global resources, and 40% of the global workforce The ultimate objective—total control through a covert, orchestrated secret coup on a global scale.

We analyse why they are pursuing this agenda—their motive. And we break down how they are achieving it—their methods, strategies, and tactics.

This structured analysis is essential for uncovering deeper patterns in geopolitical strategy, disinformation campaigns, and covert operations. By its very nature, this agenda operates in secret, making it crucial to define the terms so we can expose the lies.

A secret creeping coup d'état.

A gradual and hidden process that erodes our voice—our ability to shape how we live. By compromising those who create our laws. This is achieved through blackmail operations, ensuring that our representatives serve foreign interests rather than ours.³¹

Hidden Motive

The secret coup d'état is an overarching strategy designed to advance the long-term objective of total control. Why do they seek to control us?

They believe they are the ones born to rule, convinced of their superior bloodline—a belief reinforced by selective breeding within their own ranks. Royal bloodlines are deeply interconnected across the world. An English genealogist who spent over 70 years tracing royal lineage discovered that Charles III is related to nearly every royal in existence, along with notables such as Charles Darwin.³²

Eugenics and Darwin’s pseudo-scientific natural selection theory.

Not our king Charles, draws inspiration from Darwin’s natural selection theory. A theory behind British Eugenics, developed by Charles Darwins cousin Francis Galton. The suprematists keep it in the family. Charles’s development of 1,200 eco-homes built in Darwin’s honour, in the tropical paradise that influenced Darwin’s fabricated theory of evolution.

The theory of evolution and eugenics have been thoroughly debunked. Yet as with Pascoe’s phoney Australian history, all it takes is a captured political and academic class along with the Big Lie Media to bring false history into public acceptance.

We can see the danger when a person of immense influence as Charles lll embraces a debunked, false Darwinian ideological survival of the fittest. An ideology that justified the mass slaughter of innocent people, including the disabled, women, and children.

For centuries, global royal supremacist rulers have subscribed to notions of cultural and racial superiority, deeply influenced by distorted interpretations of Darwinism and theories before it—an ideological manipulation of evolutionary theory used to justify imperial dominance and the subjugation of those deemed inferior. The Royals continue to promote depopulation policies, which remain a fundamental pillar of their broader agenda, rooted in their contrived hierarchy of human worth.

Throughout history, supremacist ideologies have shaped policies, laws, and conflicts, serving as the underlying rationale for covert operations aimed at restructuring societal frameworks. For the ruling class’s benefit.

Their guiding principle remains the belief in their inherent superiority over the masses.—justifying their actions in the pursuit of control. Ends justifies the means.

These psychopaths have no conscience, believe themselves unaccountable to no man or God.

Hidden Tactics

To obscure the true mechanisms of control, their tactics include: warping reality, media control, institutional capture, blackmail, black propaganda operations, strategy of tension, censorship, false flags, scapegoating, collective framing, false attribution, cut-outs, front organisations, public figure decoys, controlled assets, deceptive perpetrators, political subversion, social media manipulation and covert influence.

All methods of consolidating power while maintaining a façade of legitimacy.

The truth has been hidden.

The outline of this international plot I share with you has taken me over 20 years to piece together. As an insider whistle-blower I have been defamed, ostracised, and relentlessly attacked as I refuse to back down.

I provide evidence, eyewitness experience and thorough research that has brought me to this deeply troubling analysis. Of what can only be described as an evil international criminal conspiracy, planned and implemented over decades.

Speaking out and revealing the truth cuts through the layers of deception built up over years. Once the mask is ripped off, they are finished.

I detail how from the inside by observing the players scheming and their deceitful manipulations I have come to these conclusions.

I spoke as an expert of Aboriginal descent, to the full UN Human Rights Council in Geneva. To explain what was happening on the ground in Aboriginal Australia. Yet I was shunned by the ruling class. To be treated with disdain at an international historic Human Rights event by fellow Australians at the time was an incomprehensible hypocrisy.

Now I understand why: They do not want an empowered humanity. They need the dysfunctional minorities and countries to grift from, and control people.

Global Banks, billionaires and International Corporations

In the Cabinet room at Parliament House, I observed CEO’s of Global Banks and major international corporations, billionaires, with the Prime Minister of Australia discussing Aboriginal affairs. At the time I did not recognise it for what it was, I knew this show for, "improving the lot for Aboriginal Australians," did not ring true.

It later became painfully clear the scheme was to exploit Aboriginal people to use as a cover to get their hands on Australia's vast natural resources as part of a global plot.

Enormous resources have been dedicated to creating confusion, deception and division—turning us against one another.

This is a worldwide secret coup and everyday people are victims. We must have compassion for ourselves and each other. The lies are all part of a larger agenda.

Our care for our fellow man,“for the greater good", has been used against us.

Unless you have seen evil first-hand, it is difficult to comprehend its full extent.

But we must, so as to expose it.

The depth of the deception to perpetrate the lies is a shock to us all.

Both the COVID and the Voice propaganda, was fever pitch to con us into compliance.

With the planned result of creating divisions in families, friends and communities.

Hidden Blackmail

Not our king Charles’s, demand for a war on humanity is very dangerous, he is the Commander-in-Chief, the Head of the Armed Forces, the patron of the British intelligence services which established and controls the five eyes intelligence agencies.

There have been more than 450 successful coups worldwide since the end of World War II, with the Five Eyes network playing a role in many of these efforts.³³

These intel agencies run the blackmail operations.

Charles III's sons have close ties to the British spy industrial complex.³⁴

Charles III's father Prince Philip a Nazi, once stated that he wished to be reincarnated as a virus to cull human population/herd. One of the Charles most influential relatives was Lord Louis Mountbatten, his great-uncle. He played a significant role in shaping Charles’ upbringing and was often referred to as his 'honorary grandfather.

Mountbatten has been accused of sympathising with both Nazi and communist ideologies.

Mountbatten was a known child abuser. Linked to the Kincora Boys’ Home child abuse scandal in Northern Ireland, where multiple boys were abused in the 1970s. A survivor accused Mountbatten of sexually abusing him aged 11, legal action has been taken against state institutions in Northern Ireland regarding these claims. FBI files released in 2019 described Mountbatten as having a perversion for young boys.

A new book further explores these allegations, claiming that boys were trafficked to Mountbatten’s castle in Ireland, as part of a broader abuse network. Functioning as a blackmail operation, with British intelligence agencies using the scandal to manipulate political figures.³⁵

The book Kincora: Britain’s Shame – Mountbatten, MI5, the Belfast Boys’ Home Sex Abuse Scandal and the British Cover-Up details how a detective, alerted by concerned social workers, secretly photographed VIPs visiting Kincora and logged their car registrations. The visitors included MI5 officials, lay magistrates, police officers, and businessmen.³⁶

Despite multiple inquiries, survivors and whistle-blowers argue that the full extent of the abuse and intelligence services role in the cover-up have never been fully exposed as official documents related to it are sealed until 2065 and 2085.³⁷

Government will not release the records for 66 years in order to protect victims’ identities. Who are they protecting?³⁸

A former police officer says a royal family member was under investigation for involvement in a child sex ring before the case was abruptly shut down under the guise of national security.³⁹

Was this national security reason have something to do with the global agenda?

Not our king: Charles’s, close ties to a number of child abusers.

Royal connections with child abuse, are relevant as this type of blackmail appears to be the only logical explanation why 178 out of 193 UN member states signed Agenda 21, effectively surrendering our rights, both personal and national autonomy.⁴⁰

If it’s not blackmail, how did they persuade our representatives to act against our interests, risking their own country and families? What else explains how nations are forced into managed decline other than blackmail?

Not our king Charles, has spent his adult life orchestrating a master plan to control the world’s resources, leveraging former Nazi-era propaganda, laws, and policies. In 1988, Charles III outlined the Agenda 21 master plan, which was later unveiled in 1992 as Agenda 21—rebranded as Agenda 2030. ⁴¹

Secret Espionage Network

The head of MI6 said climate change is the agencies, biggest international concern.

They admit having engaged in "green spying" to track major polluters and ensure nations adhere to their climate commitments for their patron the King.⁴²

Image from Richard Poe, on Twitter (x) see here

Recent works by reputable researches provide evidence that Hitler was recruited and groomed into leadership by the Western ruling class ⁴³

The agenda to control resources at local, national, and global levels is not new. To achieve this, subversion tactics are employed to overthrow governments.

Hidden Nazi Ideology

The concept of eliminating so-called inferior populations originated in Britain well before the emergence of Nazi Germany. From its British roots, the pseudo-science of eugenics spread to many other nations, evolving into what could be described as an international eugenics movement. Years before the rise of the Nazis, British eugenicists formulated an ideological framework to justify measures against those they perceived as inferior.⁴⁴

Analysing the interconnectedness of royal bloodlines—alongside documented Nazi affiliations and sympathies within the closely related royal families of Europe—coupled with their efforts to undermine the Allied forces during World War II, provides an explanation as to why Charles, as the head of the global nobility, would seek to revive Nazi-era policies.

Download map here

Agenda 21/2030 directives were first implemented in Nazi Germany where they were the first to introduce sustainable development into planning, policy, and law—guiding every aspect of governance.

Sustainable development concerns in Nazi Germany shaped not only domestic policy but also military strategy, with the Nazis even devising war plans based on these principles. Today, sustainable development remains the foundation of the Agenda 21/2030 the king’s master plan.⁴⁵

The climate emergency big lie lives on with King Charles' installation of Agenda 2030 doomsday climate clocks in Berlin, New York, Seoul, Rome, and Glasgow, along with 150 across the UK—clocks designed to dictate “what must be done and by when.”

When considering the above it is not a surprise that the climate change con was developed by a former Nazi who later founded the German Green Party, the foundation from which a global network of Green parties worldwide sprung up. This movement has served as a front to legitimise global misinformation and subversion.⁴⁶

Blackmail Australian Operation

Although the Voice has been defeated, the supremacists still control the country through blackmail. The decades of institutional manipulation is undermining the foundations of our nation. The Voice was never the vital component of their agenda; rather, it was a device to divide the nation, deflecting blame onto Aboriginal Australia, to prevent us from fighting back together.

With the Indigenous Voice, positioned above government, it was a foreseeable situation where farmers lost their land and food shortages struck, they wanted angry mobs to turn against Aboriginal people, not the compromised government and their hidden handlers. Their malevolent plan all along.

Now they are implementing a treaty process.

How can treaty function when the compromised government refuses to address the criminality of fraudulent Aboriginal identity claims, and support criminals, controlling Aboriginal Australia? Indigenous scholars estimate that about a third of the Aboriginal population has no Aboriginal heritage.

Fake claimers are driven by a supremacy myth—ideology where the ends justify the means. As a result, Aboriginal affairs have devolved into a criminal cesspit controlled by individuals with power, resources, and hidden agendas. This has led to serious injustices, including crimes against Aboriginal elders, such as bullying harassment, physical assaults and false imprisonment.

As a former Crown prosecutor, the elders approached me, they knew I had won many cases for victims of crime. I have fought for justice against criminals, who abuse others, to change victims lives for the better.

Mid North Coast of NSW elders had been blocked by state police when reporting crimes. They asked me to take their concerns to Canberra so to stop a government-appointed leader involved in child trafficking, abuse and drug dealing.

His abuse led to suicides of 6 children.

This government funded criminal was advocating for the Voice.

Voice co- chair, Marcia Langton asked me to submit my request for police investigation of this criminal only to her, not directly to the Australian Federal Police and Crime Commission. These agencies had identified the same criminal activity in a seven-year joint investigation, concluding, the Aboriginal industrial complex was run by organised crime. I sought expert law enforcement advice on how to address this criminality. As my responsibility was to the people of NSW and all Australians. I had to determine as an independent advisor to the Prime Minister on the Voice, whether measures could be implemented to counteract this criminality.

I had factual information, specific times, dates, statements and names of perpetrators. Detailed evidence to provide to the federal police.

Langton and the government denied my request and threatened to dismiss me.

Is it Langton’s highly unprofessional reply below, due to her handlers fear of potential exposure. The long history of criminality in the Aboriginal Industry suggests this is the case. Would another investigation by the Crime Commission expose he government to be linked to the same Aboriginal criminal organisation.

I knew too much. I was getting too close to the truth and had to be silenced.

Black Propaganda

I was sacked from the Voice, committee, for wanting to expose the drug trafficking and abuse of indigenous children.

They created a black propaganda operation. Redirecting attention away from the evidence of child abuse, suicides and drug trafficking into a media storm centred on my exposure of Bruce Pascoe.⁴⁷

They attempted to ruin my reputation. The big lie media never investigated the truth—nor did they scrutinise Pascoe’s long track record of deception.

It felt as though a black cloud was engulfing Australia.

My final post, revealing the coverup of the abuse of children and drug trafficking, had 10,000 views within 24 hours. I faced a coordinated wave of attacks from online accounts bearing cult-like symbols, led by another fake Aboriginal figure, British agent Mark McMurtrie.

The post, culminated in my lifetime ban from social media channels. Why is it McMurtries social media post where he calls for politicians to be beheaded are still online.

I was threatened with scalping.

This evil goes deep. The goal was, silence me at any cost.

Aboriginal viewers who supported me were also subjected to abuse and insults from fake Aboriginal profiles. The last comment before my ban came from McMurtrie himself, attacking me for exposing the fraudulent Bruce Pascoe.

This co-ordinated move to silence us indicated a worldwide plot to use Indigenous people for a nefarious agenda. What are our rulers so afraid of being revealed?

Exposing: Political Control

McMurtrie claims to possess 4 filing cabinets of blackmail material on the Liberal Party.

He boasts online to close ties to political figures such as Craig Kelly and of his ability to secure testimony from Arthur Sinodinos (former John Howard chief of staff, former Ambassador to the United States between February 2020 and March 2023).⁴⁸

McMurtrie had sued the Commonwealth of Australia, alleging that the government had withheld funds allocated for Aboriginal programs. He intended to use the funds to finance his airplane hangar business. A lawsuit against the government for exactly $33 million suggests it was likely Masonic theatre.⁴⁹

See here

This raises many questions:

What was the purpose of this theatrical display.

Was this a signal of McMurtrie’s role in coordinating blackmail operations.

Or was there another motive behind a case that was never going to succeed.

Could McMurtrie’s airplane hangar business have been involved in trafficking as part of the larger blackmail operation.

Was it used to transport the blackmail drug discussed below.

Or to transport child abuse victims entangled in this network.

How does McMurtrie get away with publicly claiming to hold blackmail material that allegedly enables him to summon a Liberal Party figure into a laughable legal battle.

Why would a senior Liberal leader be entangled in this.

Why hasn’t McMurtrie handed over the alleged blackmail material on child abuse to the police.

Is he claiming to possess it to keep our political class in line with a hidden agenda.

McMurtrie is recorded as saying he, “wants every Australian to rot in the ground."

Yet can McMurtrie summon former PM, John Howard’s trusted chief of staff.

Why is a deeply flawed individual with clear indications of criminality—allowed free rein, funded by taxpayers.

McMurtrie has the means, the connections, and the access.

McMurtrie’s partners in crime include those with access to vulnerable children.

McMurtrie appeared before the UN, urging UNESCO (The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) to take action against Australia as a racist, despotic country, mismanaging Indigenous Aboriginal people and Aboriginal cultural sites including, “Natural Rock Formations”.

How did McMurtrie have this intel years before Juukan. Was the orchestrated sacred site Juukan Hoax a British operation. If so why did they go to such efforts. Costing $800 million in, reparations. This makes sense when this is but a drop in the great taking prize of the trillions in Australia’s natural resource Wealth.

McMurtrie claims, he is indigenous and therefore owns the world. His calls for an unqualified right to self-determination which in international law implies a right to secession. Is this what the first nations map of Australia, NZ, North America is all about. Seceding from the Australian nation to break up into ‘first nations’. Governed by fake claimers.

British agent Sacha Stone, while speaking on 'Genocide in Australia', confidently told listeners referring to (McMurtrie) “it could be that we’re looking at an Australian Prime Minister.”⁵⁰

Both Stone and McMurtrie advocated for the invasion of Australia by foreign troops during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID deception was designed to make the public lose faith in government services and the checks and balances meant to protect everyday Australians. This was further exacerbated by Mark McMurtrie and his cult members, who falsely claimed that defence force personnel forcibly restrained Aboriginal people to administer the COVID vaccine. They went as far as to call for the invasion of Australia—evidence of which can be seen in the clip below.

American commentator Stew Peters, known for promoting Nazi rhetoric, also publicly called for Australia to be invaded. Likewise, Candace Owens pushed a colonial agenda aimed at undermining national sovereignty—undoubtedly aligning with the interests of her in-laws, who have close ties to the British Royal family behind this .

Exposing the Predatory Frauds

McMurtrie and his cult claim to be pedophile hunters.

They are pretending to expose child abuse while they are suspects complicit in it.

Clearly to get our parliament representatives commit treason and undermine Australia the likely cause is blackmail this must have been a massive, coordinated operation. They cannot get away with it when we know.

This is a worldwide plot. Blackmail operations have been uncovered in multiple countries.

A blackmail operation was orchestrated from within a Masonic lodge in Italy. Documents seized during a raid exposed a vast network of corruption and coercion, implicating many of Italy’s most powerful individuals. Magistrates described how the group had constructed a state within the state, employing blackmail to achieve its objectives. The lodge had compiled files on more than 157,000 prominent individuals, including tapes and photographs intended for blackmail.⁵¹

This explains how they can control nations. Then, I discovered a drug capable of stripping victims of their free will—the perfect tool for blackmail.

Exposing the Hidden Blackmail Drug

International criminals and our compromised, blackmailed leaders. Managed by threat of blackmail, have over decades, brought in harmful legislation.

A McMurtrie associate contacted me in an attempt to gain my trust. He revealed information about scopolamine, also known as Devil’s Breath or the Zombie drug. Saying, whoever controls this drug also controls child trafficking worldwide.

A powerful mind-control substance that strips individuals of free will.

Enabling the drugs administrator to manipulate their targets into compromising situations. All recorded to be used later as blackmail material.

The revelation was key, given that McMurtrie had publicly claimed to possess blackmail material on Australia’s political class and had threatened to behead representatives during the COVID-19 pandemic, accusing them of being pedophiles.

In the below clip McMurtrie tells Youtube “we need to put every politician’s head on the block and chop their heads off.”

It was then that I understood their operation: silencing politicians by holding blackmail material over their heads while simultaneously fuelling public outrage. This would create a perfect storm—one that would allow them to dismantle our country.

Australia is the largest producer of this drug capable of eliminating free will.

Under its influence, a person can be made to do anything.

Tricked into compromising themselves while being recorded.

A documentary about this drug, features a man who assisted a robber in stealing everything from his own flat.⁵²

A Nazi war criminal escaped a life sentence when a major pharmaceutical company requested early release to establish a crop of scopolamine in Kingaroy, Queensland.⁵³

Yet discussions on MKULTRA and mind control never mention it. I have written several articles on the subject, yet I have not seen anyone investigate it.

This supremacy cult continues to try to silence me and bully others. Confirming their role in the agenda. Hyped communications are designed to instil fear—that is their goal. They believe they can manipulate us, leading us like sheep into a trap.

We will not allow this to happen once we recognise who they truly are.

I persisted in rattling their cage to gather data and identify who and what is behind it all. Investigating what has been not discussed to find what is being hidden. This way I have identified patterns and compiled evidence.

Unveiling the enemy is the first and most vital step in defending ourselves.

Exposing: the Atlantis myth

I traced both Pascoe, McMurtrie’s and associates back to the Khemit School of Ancient Mysticism in the Giza of Egypt. Khemitology falsely claims to be based on ancient "indigenous wisdom”, and the Atlantis Aryan myth. ⁵⁴

This cults belief is of an Aryan race before the Aboriginal peoples of the world. This theory remains an untestable and intangible heritage. As seen with the cults intangible claims of Aboriginally.

Just as the UN Indigenous Heritage Act is based on the intangible. Open to whatever interpretation they concoct in their scheme for global control.

From my research across the world, what I found was a cesspit of cultists exploiting Indigenous histories and cultures, distorting historical narratives, and promoting supremacist ideology. Indigenous peoples worldwide are being used as scapegoats in a secret coup d’état.

Another actor tied to this network and promoter of Khemitology is Graham Hancock.

Like Pascoe, Hancock employs similar methods, claiming that a vast conspiracy is suppressing the true history. His fraudulent theories were showcased on Netflix and promoted by British agent Tucker Carlson.

When history is stripped of rational analysis and speculation replaces the scrutiny of evidence, it becomes myth/intangible. Those who embrace a mythologised version of history pose an existential threat to everyday people. Intangible becomes the device to silence us all when confronted by obvious lies and frauds.

A striking example is Atlantis, which was woven into Nazi ideology as the supposed birthplace of the Aryans—a fabricated narrative falsely depicting it as the first great civilisation from which all others emerged. This intangible myth justified fraudulent hierarchies of human worth and rationalised the culling of innocent human beings.

These supremacy cultists are assaulting truth, expert knowledge and recorded history to create confusion of what is truth and what are lies.

Blurring the lines of reality and fiction to deliberately create tension and collapse.

They want us to fight each other.

I knew I was dealing with a dangerous cult when I discovered in sinister film clips McMurtrie's fascination with the Spear of Destiny.

Adolf Hitler, held an obsession with the Spear of Destiny, believed to be the weapon that pierced Jesus's side. Nazi leaders adhered to a mix of pantheist, pagan and occultist beliefs. Hitler himself was a pantheist who held disdain for Christianity.⁵⁵

In his worldview, nature was God—an ideology tied to Darwinist beliefs that only the fittest should survive. An Emeritus Professor of History, says:⁵⁶

I knew something was gravely wrong when they rolled out Aquaman star Jason Momoa to endorse an Aboriginal Voice. A strange recruitment as Momoa has no connection to Aboriginal Australia. His movie centres on the Atlantis myth.

Perhaps he was selected by the cult as his belief aligns with the Atlantis supremacist myth. As seen at the end of the clip below⁵⁷.

In this supremacist theory, only the cults ancestors are credited with creating anything of value on Earth. They believe themselves to be superior, the fittest, the chosen ones, insisting that only their forebears advanced humanity.

By this warped logic, everyday people are deemed inferior and deserving of management, selection and culling like cattle. So far removed from normal human behaviour that it seems incomprehensible.

Everyday people struggle to grasp the mindset of those whose actions stem from a belief in their superiority and therefore our subordination to their rule. In a modern day survival of the fittest, Darwinism. We are to be ruled by our superiors, the fittest.

Bruce Pascoe’s theories only began to make sense once I traced him to an Atlantis Aryan cult. Pascoe is not referring to Aboriginal people when he claims that Australia’s first inhabitants invented, “bread and democracy". He believes in a master race mythology, one that he and ruling-class supremacists believe they are descended from a superior bloodline.

Bruce Pascoe spoke at a conference in 2018 with those who believe in the Aryan myth and believing they are descended from aliens see here.

Bruce Pascoe has deliberately manipulated historical records to align with this dangerous supremacist ideology.

The same ideology led to the genocides of children, the disabled, the Slavs, Jews, Romanians and others in Europe by an Aryan supremacist regime.

Perverting history is outlawed in Europe where ethnic genocide has been perpetrated by those who believed themselves superior with the right to manage and cull humans.

This unwarranted legitimacy raises a critical question: how have such flawed figures managed to gain control over our country?

This deception serves as a key component in the secret takeover underway.

A global secret creeping Coup d’état, land/Nations grab.

The crime of the century.

Exposing: the Strategy of Tension

In the Agenda 21 masterplan, there is a chapter on Indigenous peoples calling for the formation of a national voice. It also references the transfer of resources.

See here

Today, the UN speaks of communal ownership of Indigenous resources and lands. This UN construct is not to benefit Indigenous peoples, it was created to to establish communal systems so to bypass national laws and protections. Enabling the ruling class to asset-strip Indigenous regions..

A deeply flawed High Court decision in the 1990s resulted in communal native title—a title that no Australian can individually own.⁵⁸

In five years’, time, by 2030, 80% of our country will be covered under communal title. Native title was first trialed by British agents in Kenya, Africa before being brought to Australia to control our land.

A plan set in motion in the 1990s in Australia in a coordinated secret creeping coup.

Aboriginal community members frequently complained about ASIC figures behaving poorly both overseas at UN and back in Aboriginal communities. These Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC) figures— are the same one legitimising/defending fake Aboriginals. The same who pushed for the Voice—are part of an international agenda embedded in Agenda 21.

ATSIC was established in the 1990s under foreign influence. ATSIC representatives spent significant time at the United Nations—funded entirely by taxpayers. If its purpose was to improve the lives of Aboriginal people, why were they overseas?⁵⁹

This was a globally coordinated effort, bringing Indigenous representatives to the UN to serve a broader agenda. The outcome was the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which many remain unaware of yet this construct has implications for national sovereignty.

British agent Julian Burger co-creator of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which effectively serves as a plan to end representative government under the guise of Indigenous governance—transferring control of natural resources into communal title.

Burger also led the worldwide 1990s UN’s Decade on Indigenous Peoples.

At the Anti-Slavery Society, a British intel front, Burger played a key role in coordinating international pressure for the Black Deaths in Custody Commission. Recommending reconciliation, resulted in the Welcome to Country performance. These staged performances are conducted in Canada, the U.S. and New Zealand.

See more here

“Welcome to Country,” was implemented by the Liberal Party Prime Minister John Howard in Australian. Recently, Liberal and National party politicians blamed Aboriginal people for, welcome to country.

This is a phoney, performance. Contrived to create tension. How can Indigenous cultures worldwide have practically the same performance.

Exposing the Scapegoating

It has the Charles lll fingerprints all over it

Those attacking me share the same pagan cultist supremacy ideology as Charles lll.

Observing the supremacy cult and its use of hidden symbols and coded language to identify its members—while simultaneously employing scapegoats to obscure its presence—reveals a pattern.

The global Indigenous Voice, referenced this same cultist belief system in British agent’s Julian Burger's Gaia Atlas of First Peoples. Where he outlined a framework for a global secret creeping coup. Executed through international sanctions, World Bank loans, and binding trade agreements designed to coerce nations into surrendering their resources under Indigenous communal systems. This strategy enables the supremacy cult to asset-strip countries while bypassing domestic legal protections, ultimately forcing nations to relinquish their land under Indigenous communal title.

To achieve this global coup, both Burger and Agenda 21 include an entire section on NGOs, identifying them as key for implementation.

At the back of Burger’s book, he features a global map of Indigenous populations alongside a list of NGOs worldwide. Part of the army to bring in this global coup.⁶⁰

Indigenous and Deindustrialisation

In Burger’s book, British agent and billionaire Maurice Strong, who profited from the modern energy sector, outlines how Indigenous are used as a pretext for deindustrialisation. He asserts that the global indigenous population is vital for a sustainable future.

I find this deeply troubling. Having lived in remote communities, I have personally surveyed Aboriginal families in Wilcannia—one of the regions with the worst life expectancy in the world.

They want what every human wants—food, a home a future.

Some don’t even have a kitchen sink, and none have access to affordable power.

Worse still they do not have safe drinking water.

Everything this supremacy cult seeks to deny us in the name of protecting the Indigenous.

Strategy of Tension

Aboriginal fronts are used as a tool to gaslight Australians and sow division.

When I investigated those who targeted me and elders for exposing fraud and grifter, Pascoe. I uncovered a cesspit of perverted cults in a symbolic world I had never encountered before.

As an example. An elder informed me that “Black Fella Revolution” was operated by a privileged, non-Aboriginal group masquerading as Aboriginal people.

In one extreme statement, they claimed white Australians had no right to call the Australia their home.

When I publicly questioned the legitimacy of the page, I was immediately targeted.

I was attacked relentlessly online by two psychologists, who appeared to control the group—one trained at a British university and the other whose profile picture featured a child with a butterfly over their mouth. Others identified as witches, members of Extinction Rebellion and other cult affiliations.

Their profiles revealed these were highly privileged individuals. Why would people with privilege use a fabricated Aboriginal front to attack everyday Australians and Aboriginal people they claimed to speak for?

What was their true motive in perpetuating this deceit?

Due to the successful sabotage of Aboriginal Australians, most everyday Australians lack a direct connection with elders in the communities, leaving them unable to verify the propaganda used to deceive us all.

As a result, I found myself debating the veracity of Pascoe’s lies with fellow Australians, both in person and online. In these discussions, I was accused of being ‘right-wing’ and a ‘Nazi’ —despite having lived in Aboriginal communities, of being Jewish (my mixed heritage I proudly share), and of being a conspiracy theorist.

My voice poses a significant threat to their agenda, as they have silenced many others before me. It became clear why I was subjected to relentless attacks—I was not someone they could control. Even the anti-discrimination laws, designed to silence dissent, could not suppress an outspoken Australian of Aboriginal descent.

I was contacted by a group claiming to want to expose Bruce Pascoe.

In reality, the group was created to capture those questioning the narrative and to weaponise Pascoe’s lies for maximum tension (the Strategy of Tension).

This group operates with the same supremacist ideology that Pascoe promotes.

The members of this phoney opposition, believe advanced Aryan civilisation existed before Aboriginal people.

The last time I spoke to the leader of the group he expressed pride in his Nazi heritage and admitted that his success relied on being a skilled liar.

I was a year into my business management PhD, researching how government and the private sector could invest in Aboriginal communities to improve outcomes.

Not knowing this was part of their agenda. I was deceived about everything.

Then, everything clicked.

Both sides are controlled .

Exposing: Media Control and Controlled Opposition

The fake defender of Truth created a controlled opposition group to get Aboriginal phoneys, "exposed" on Andrew Bolt’s program. Claiming to reveal the truth while inferring that Aboriginal people condoned the fakes.

Another media scam to gas light and confuse people trying to understand the debate.

Add the anti-discrimination laws so Australians cannot enter the debate. For fear of repercussions. As seen in another Bolt media circus where he called out a fake to be media roasted for defamation.

When last on Bolt’s show, I attempted to reveal the criminality and corruption in the Aboriginal Industry silencing the voice of elders. Yet Bolt cut me off. He refused to air my concerns for the Australian public to hear.

Bolt, though claiming to expose corruption and lies his role is to manage information.

Bolt is managed. His handlers don’t want the public to know information that would reveal their agenda.

In a coordinated attack on the Australian people by media, phoney opposition groups, fake online profiles using influence techniques, NGOs, and celebrities.We were watching staged theatrics and actors rolled out for a foreign interference-driven, Voice.

Corruption within the Aboriginal industrial complex through foreign interference using UN and NGOs is the key to understanding their master plan.

The official narrative pushed by media celebrities, like Bolt create the narrative.

For example, on ATSIC, media suggesting that the government alone made the decision to close it down and Aboriginal people concealed the corruption.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

As seen in Wilcannia with amongst the highest proportion of Aboriginal Australians, had the highest NO votes, percentage in Australia as they did not want, “more of "Canberra's Voice.”

Similarly, the widespread perception that Aboriginal people receive handouts is cruelly misleading. With the bulk of funding siphoned into billionaires’ pockets, international corporations and militant NGOs. As part of their coup agenda. As taxpayers we are paying through the captured Aboriginal industry, for our own demise.

Globally money flows to companies like Rio Tinto—whose major shareholder is tied to the British Royal family—or to billionaires with royal connections, such as World Economic Forum leader Andrew Forrest and casino magnate James Packer.⁶¹

Both men have close ties to the British Royal family. An institution benefiting for centuries in the exploitation of Indigenous peoples worldwide ensuring that Indigenous communities remain sabotaged.

Funds allocated to Indigenous corporations and non-profits rarely reach those who need them. These entities engage in para-political manoeuvres. NGOs collaborate in orchestrated "colour revolutions,” to loot countries of their resources and their sovereignty.

A betrayal of epic proportions.

False Legitimacy

Those clearly linked to child abuse blackmail had orchestrated the Juukan Hoax years in advance. What other logical explanation could there be of how they have managed this Juukan false flag operation.

In the video clip below of McMurtrie—posing as an Aboriginal person—he urges the UN to invade Australia for destroying natural rock formations, and "sacred sites”.⁶²

Agent Provocateur & a False Flag Operation

I was contacted by an individual who had a petition with nearly 10,000 signatures calling for Bruce Pascoe’s exposure as a fraud and his dangerous book of lies removed from classrooms.

They shared with me a submission proving that the 2020 Juukan rock blast was a hoax, orchestrated through the collusion of all sides of government to create a false flag event.⁶³

The parliamentary inquiry received this submission but refused to publish it.⁶⁴

As doing so would expose their complicity in treason against the Australian people.

UNESCO’s Involvement

The Juukan parliamentary inquiry was a fraudulent four-month examination that failed to question why the caves/natural rock formations were deemed highly significant after 17 years of silence. It disregarded the truth and factual evidence, failing to scrutinise anything, and instead spreading falsehoods to justify a suite of measures designed to implement a new phoney Indigenous/global governance model.

Including new laws based on UNESCO's interpretation of "intangible heritage," creating opportunities for false claimers with fabricated histories to exploit in advancing the master plan.

It also recommended implementing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), which explicitly recognises Indigenous peoples' right to self-determination, self-governance, and control over natural resources. This strategy of tension was designed to fracture the country. Leading to Australia being divided into First Nations.

Why Juukan is a Hoax

Over a 17-year negotiation period, the Native Title corporation never raised any objections to blasting at Juukan, a naturally occurring rock formation.

During this time, no concerns were expressed regarding the site's significance—nothing was ever flagged as important.

Local Aboriginal people removed the mostly fossilised dung from the site, leaving it unclaimed. For years in a container. If Juukan was truly sacred, why wasn’t its contents collected?

The native title corporation was allocated more than $17 million to obtain independent advice on blasting the Juukan rock, yet at no point during the nearly 20-year negotiation process did they object to the planned demolition. Going along with the lie to later receive $800 million.⁶⁵

There are thousands of similar naturally occurring rock formations in the Pilbara. Juukan holds no significant archaeological value.

Natural Rock Formations become intangible, sacred site for a control agenda

Skilled professionals excavated the so-called 'artefacts,' which primarily consisted of fossilised animal excrement (dung). No cave paintings were found, nor was there any evidence of cultural ceremonies. ⁶⁶

The Juukan natural rock formation blasting was approved by the government in 2016 after an extensive due diligence process—including proof of years of consultations with the native title corporation and agreement to blast, numerous expert reports, and detailed maps —is required by law for approval for rock blasting. This documentation was provided, the native title corporation received formal notification of the application to blast, no objections were raised to blasting Juukan. Again there was no objection to the blasting for more than 17 years.⁶⁷

Agent Provocateur: Heather Builth

Former Rio Tinto employee and Pascoe’s key influencer for his invention of history⁶⁸ Heather Builth suddenly declared via email that the site had great cultural significance. Following this, attempts were made to remove the explosives with expert assistance, but it was ultimately deemed too dangerous. Environmental leaching of the explosives posed threats to humans, animals, and flora in the surrounding environment, creating a toxic hazard. By then, it was too late to prevent the destruction of the Juukan rock formations.

Builth's was waiting until the Juukan rock was filled with explosives. She gave a weak excuse that she had mentioned it in a unrecorded meeting months earlier. If it was truly significant, why did Builth fail to document it in writing? She understood the process, having worked at Rio Tinto just before taking this role in the Native Title corporation. Yet Builth failed to formally write to anyone at Rio Tinto and later claimed she couldn’t reach anyone in time—hard to believe, given her recent employment there.

The Federal Parliamentary inquiry into Juukan failed to cross-examine Builth regarding her propensity to lie and fabricate historical narratives to serve a political agenda. This is clearly a case of premeditated treason, evident in Heather Builth’s 2009 paper on UNECSO’s intangible heritage, where she outlined how it was her role to fabricate narratives for political agendas/coordinated coups. In Builth’s own words, she states this is her role:

More than material cultural heritage, the intangible is greatly influenced by the politics of the past and present. The work of archaeologists and anthropologists in reconstructing the past and bringing that information into the present has always been beholden to the political agenda of then and now.⁶⁹

Yet they failed to question Builth, a proven liar, even when Rio Tinto’s submission outlined a sequence of events that did not align with the undeniable falsehoods presented in the inquiry—lies echoed by NGOs influenced by foreign interests, such as the Sunrise Project, the WWF, and billionaire insider traitors like Mike Cannon-Brooks' NGO: The Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility (ACCR).⁷⁰

These militant NGOs coordinated the deception amplified by the big lie media through a public perception influence operation designed to conceal the truth.

Clearly, Aboriginal people are being used as a scapegoat for Charles III’s master plan. This has happened before, in 2016 leaked emails revealed that British agent John Podesta was working with NGOs in Australia to halt a massive development financed by our Southeast Asian neighbours. Our British rulers weren’t having it and they tried to use Aboriginal Australia as the device to stop it.⁷¹

What is truly concerning about Juukan is that it proves our political class is compromised. The Juukan Parliamentary inquiry received a submission proving that Juukan sacred site destruction was a lie.⁷²

When I wrote to the government asking why they refused to publish it, they declined to provide a reason. This omission is clear evidence of their guilty mind—otherwise, they would have made it public. Instead, they concealed the proof from the public to keep their treasonous plot hidden.

After I publicly exposed this treason, Juukan Federal Parliamentary inquiry member George Christensen—who presents himself as a freedom fighter—attacked me. ⁷³

Then, the broader picture became clear: the AFP had previously warned about the blackmail risk associated with government MP George Christensen due to his ‘activities’ in South-East Asia.

The Juukan scam inquiry included Warren Entsch MP, Senator Matthew Canavan, Mr. George Christensen MP, Senator Patrick Dodson, Senator Sam McMahon, Senator Rachel Siewert, Senator Dean Smith, Warren Snowdon MP, Phillip Thompson OAM MP, Senator Lidia Thorpe, and Ms. Anika Wells MP.

UNESCO's Eugenics-Inspired 'Intangible' Laws

What sort of blackmail do they hold on Federal Parliamentary inquiry members to get them to recommend UNESCO's eugenics-inspired intangible laws be enacted in every state and territory of Australia. What else explains why Juukan Parliamentary inquiry members used the Juukan hoax—a false flag—to justify these laws in the publics mind, framing them as necessary, while ultimately facilitating the destruction of Australian farmers and our future.

A coup plot which would have facilitated fake claimers to fabricate history to justify the removal of farmers, fences, and livestock. As Pascoe demands in the clip below: “stop ploughing the land,” “eat kangaroo instead of cattle and sheep” and “pull down the fences.”

Exposing: Political Control

"Intangible" heritage was the device fraudulent claimants use to fabricate history, and the Juukan legislation is the mechanism they can exploit to take control of our country—and eventually, the world. They can use it to force farmers out of business, and without food, our society and economy would collapse.⁷⁴

This was not the first time Builth’s lies were used by UNESCO. Her proven falsehoods were previously used to designate part of Victoria as a World Heritage site.

If UNESCO can assign such status based on Builth’s fabrications, what’s stopping them from shutting down other locations based on similarly intangible or fabricated claims? Why should an overseas organisation—unaccountable to the Australian people—dictate how Australians preserve their own heritage? Are Australians not capable of managing their own land and people?⁷⁵

Builth had a long history of working with UNESCO, which readily accepted her historical falsehoods. Royal agent, eugenicist Julian Huxley, a founding member of Prince Philip's WWF, was entrusted with establishing UNESCO—an institution he saw as a vehicle for advancing a human cull. He viewed it as his mission to make the unthinkable thinkable again, effectively reviving eugenics.⁷⁶

As the former head of the British Eugenics Society, Huxley played a significant role in promoting the disproven pseudoscience of eugenics. Even before the Nazi-era eugenics genocides, Huxley’s grandfather was its chief proponent, spreading eugenics worldwide and leading to the establishment of an international movement.

This is the "intangible" loophole, meaning that one does not need to prove that something existed or provide any evidence. Builth indicates this was the plan years before the Juukan Hoax:⁷⁷

When the physical and the tangible have long ago been taken and the former Indigenous owners have been displaced, sometimes all that remains is the intangible.

Juukan/UNESCO legislation: imprisonment on intangible claims

When farmers were removed from their land, due to intangible UNESCO's eugenics inspired laws, mass human starvation and civil collapse would follow. The British ruling class have a long history of being behind famines as a device to control nations.

The UNESCO law was a threat to farmers and all businesses, post the Juukan hoax. It included penalties of up to 10 million in fines and 5 years imprisonment for non-compliance. It was entirely foreseeable that farmers could face jail time for something as routine as installing a fence post—unless they paid off the frauds in the local Aboriginal native title corporations. Notably captured native title corporations could still refuse. Devastating the farming industry in Australia and its food supply to the people. Knowing the plan to asset strip our country one can see the importance of the Juukan false flag to install despotic UNESCO legislation.⁷⁸

Organised crime: A killer becomes leader of his victim’s Aboriginal community

Under the proposed UNESCO law, any land development—even minor changes such as installing fences—would require approval from an Aboriginal corporation.

How would that work when the Aboriginal industry is run by fake claimer enemy combatants and organised crime? Clearly, it is not designed for the benefit of Australians.⁷⁹

The following true story reveals how Aboriginal affairs operates. If they can do this to Aboriginal families, imagine how they would have targeted farmers.

In Wilcannia, a man convicted of killing an Aboriginal woman with the butt of his rifle became a government-appointed leader. Recruited while in prison and, upon his release after serving a sentence for killing this local woman in front of her children. He was fast-tracked into leadership and promoted as a renowned “Aboriginal artist.”

Recently, he was granted $7 million to build an art gallery in a community with one of the lowest life expectancies in the world. Where men are fortunate if they reach their 30th birthday and women their 40th. Residents must pay for water because drinking Wilcania’s water made them ill.

Illness included the cessation of women’s menstrual cycles.

A town with no industry or work, was a generation ago, the Queen of the Desert.⁸⁰

If Aboriginal Australia is controlled by organised crime, and people are punished for questioning fabricated history and fake claimers. Nothing is stopping them from declaring most of Australia sacred and shutting down the entire country. Although Australia said NO to to Canberra’s voice. This is still their directive.

We are seeing this with closed national parks and the iconic Uluru/Ayers Rock. This is not an Aboriginal demand. Aboriginal people, including members of my extended family from Mutitjulu—the Aboriginal community near Ayers Rock—have asked me;

“Why don’t Australians come to climb Ayers Rock anymore?”

They were not consulted then, nor were they consulted about the Voice.

Exposing: the 1970 Australian coup

The information warfare surrounding this issue is filled with subterfuge, obscuring the true reason behind the Royals' dismissal of our government. Now that we understand their vast ownership of major multinational corporations like Rio Tinto, it makes sense why they seek to conceal the truth.

We also recognise their role in fuelling unrest and orchestrating the managed decline of Papua New Guinea, our neighbour, to gain access to its vast natural resources. The royals history of asset-stripping Africa and India is a pattern of global exploitation. ⁸¹

Their dismissal of this government was not due to its left-wing policies.

They removed this government because it posed a threat to their plans for asset-stripping Australia.

The Minister for Minerals, Rex Connor was determined to ensure that Australians benefited from their country's rich mineral deposits. In a parliamentary speech on 7 August, 1974, he highlighted a startling fact: approximately 62% of minerals were under foreign ownership or control, with this figure exceeding 70% for crude oil and natural gas.

Connor and his supporters were unwavering in their mission to reduce these figures and achieve full Australian ownership of key resources—including uranium, crude oil, natural gas, and coal. This ambitious plan was perceived as a direct threat to the interests of foreign corporations and the British monarchy, which stood to lose significant profits if Australia were to take control of its own resources.⁸²

Conner and his supporters were set up in a Black Propaganda operation.

Resulting in today, Australia only receives from 2-10% of mining royalties for gold and coal, whereas countries that own their resources receive up to 80% royalties. The control of our mineral wealth prevents our development into a strong prosperous nation. Not our king, Charles, believes he owns Australia. We are in the way.

This disparity highlights the need for Australia to re-examine its relationship with foreign corporations and the British monarch.

Exposing: The Trap

Despite supplying evidence, the serious revelations got no media coverage.

I had been in the media, studied journalism and knew people in the industry. Yet no one in mainstream media showed any genuine concern.

Only the likes of Bolt whose role was to silence and discredit my evidence.

I was offered help by a retired captain of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), who claimed to have worked with Alan Jones (charged with child trafficking offences) at 2GB radio station and for mining billionaire, Gina Rinehart, of Hancock Prospecting.

The Hancock/Rinehart dynasty are devoted royalists. Gina held for her staff coronation celebrations.⁸³

I discovered the chilling clip below, where Hancock is captured saying,

‘We should poison the mixed breeds’ on national TV.

I recalled with dread the Aboriginal women of Wilcannia telling me that the water was poisonous, and they had ceased menstruation. Despite their pleas for clean water, the government allocated $7 million for an art gallery, nothing for safe drinking water.

Insider Traitors

A retired ASIO Capitan and editor of a book had contacted me to publish my articles.

He was working for Gina Rinehart. He claimed he wanted to help me get the information I had discovered published. Offering to review my open letter about the Juukan Hoax he redrafted it to portray me as obsessed with Pascoe.

The Pascoe distraction was used before to try to silence me.

This was another insider traitor engaged to stop this information being made available to Australians. I cut off contact.

His brother had revealed to me, Lang Hancock had paid his team to help remove a government elected by the Australian people in the 1970s.

They were still working for the ruling class.

A Royal Inspired coup, staged an overthrow in Australia.

This successful coup of Australia for the ruling class was executed under cover to enrich our superiors. Evidence reveals, Rex Connor was pushing to claim the mineral resource wealth for the Australian people. Connor had to be removed for the ruling class and royals to continue to strip Australia’s vast wealth unhindered.⁸⁴

Coups are a key component of the Agenda 21/30 strategy to destabilise countries, allowing our masters and rulers.

I could now see the connection between the theft of Australia’s mineral wealth and the royals elaborate Rio Tinto scheme to use the Juukan Hoax to sterilise Australia through the UNESCO Intangible Heritage Act. And to introduce Agenda 21/30

The UN was established by British agents as part of a decades-long plan to deprive nations not only of their wealth but also their sovereignty.

The idea of global governance is openly discussed in Victorian England, from its conception the United Nations was always a British idea.

When I addressed farmers in Western Australia, they had no knowledge of the facts of the Juukan Hoax. None of them could have imagined such maliciousness from the representatives they had elected to power. After speaking with them, I put my concerns in writing and published an open letter, formally placing these representatives on notice for committing treason. I outlined the process over decades by which Australia’s sovereignty was being handed over to unaccountable international organisations.⁸⁵

Within 2 weeks the Heritage act was withdrawn. Their plot exposed they backed off. The perpetrators of this treason are afraid of exposure.

This withdrawal of an integral part of their plan is encouraging.

Demonstrating our power when we know the truth.

Exposing: Billionaire Traitors in Control Canberra

Now I understood why billionaires have unrestricted access to Canberra’s corridors of power. Though they may appear to be on opposing sides, they ultimately seek the same outcome.This is why they orchestrated the Voice PSYOP—to manufacture mass division through a Strategy of Tension.

It also explains their involvement in the massive scam known as the Juukan Hoax. Why didn’t Australia’s wealthiest person, Rinehart, speak out about it? As a miner, she would have known the implications for her business empire. So why didn’t she use her position to warn the Australian people? The only logical explanation is that she was involved. That’s why she sent her agent to try and manage me.

The billionaires manage the political class.

After we led a campaign to defeat the UNESCO Juukan Hoax legislation, billionaire Simon Holmes à Court stood among the leading figures of the supremacist cult, pushing the deindustrialisation agenda for his own greedy interests.

It’s a scam—an attempt to seize control by using Indigenous people as scapegoats. This explains why Holmes à Court was among the biggest backers of the Voice.

Holmes à Court is connected to the Juukan hoax, entangled in its aftermath.

Furious from our success in defeating the UNESCO WA legislation. I was stunned by the uncontrolled fury directed at me and Elders, by Holmes à Court’s nephew, Angelo von Möller. An obviously disturbed young man leading a gang of mostly anonymous profiles who hurled vile insults at me and the elders.

Von Möller and his accomplices, unleashed abuse from what I assumed to be driven by their supremacy ideology. Suggesting they could not fathom being challenged by people of Aboriginal heritage at the bottom of their phoney human worth scale.

They threatened to have me sectioned. As they had Charlie Reid.

What else could explain such a colossal strategic blunder? Their actions, seismic in their miscalculation, only fuelled my determination to push harder. I was over the target—I had deeply wounded their decades-long plot.

Again, the attack came out of nowhere. I had never even heard of Angelo von Möller before. But when I looked deeper, I discovered that his LinkedIn profile showed a close association with UNESCO. His gang of online stalkers targeted me and the elders on Twitter (X), even threatening to have us locked up.

The hypocrisy is glaring—they claimed to support Aboriginal Australia while simultaneously attacking elders from some of the most disadvantaged Australian communities who were bravely speaking.

Von Möller had served as a special adviser to the U.S. embassy in Canberra and held the position: the Deputy Youth Premier of Victoria from May 2023 to May 2024. He was frequently photographed alongside the key figures both national and international. Then, I discovered unsettling photos on his social media—images with known to be linked to child trafficking.

This appeared to be the blackmail cesspit controlling our country.

Angelo von Möller’s ancestor Nazi leader, the second cousin of Queen Victoria.

Is history repeating itself? Are we seeing a covert WW2 supremacist global coup.

I conclude that nothing is as it seems. Those who recognise that something is seriously amiss question the narratives we are bombarded with, forget the distractions, dig deeper, and trust no one with a platform. It is you and your fellow Australians who will restore the country to what we know as the essence of the human spirit.

As Tammy King from Wilcannia says, Fight together, not each other.

Thank you to all of the Elders for your bravery.

RIP Old fella may your memory live in our hearts to inspire us to take our country back.

This is a battle we will not lose.

Unchain Australia. Unchain the world.

Crime of the century

Definitions:

• Access Exploitation—leveraging an insider’s position to extract classified information or manipulate decision-making.

• Active Measures—Covert influence operations designed to destabilise societies, manipulate historical narratives, and steer public sentiment toward a predetermined goal.

• Agent Provocateur in a False Flag Operation—a covert operative who deliberately incites unrest or illegal actions to justify government intervention.

• Asset Recruitment—identifying and persuading individuals with access to sensitive information to become informants.

• Behavioural Profiling—studying decision-making patterns and psychological tendencies.

• Blackmail & Psychological Pressure—using kompromat (compromising material) to coerce those in power into compliance.

• Black Market Operations—trafficking weapons, drugs, or illicit goods through hidden supply chains.

• Black Market Trade—trafficking weapons, drugs, or illicit goods through hidden supply chains.

• Black Propaganda Operations—a form of covert disinformation designed to mislead, manipulate, or discredit a target while concealing its true source.

• Black Market Operations—trafficking weapons, drugs, or illicit goods through hidden supply chains.

• Black Market Trade—trafficking weapons, drugs, or illicit goods through hidden supply chains.

• Clandestine Cell Structures—isolated groups operating independently to limit exposure.

• Competitive Sabotage—disrupting supply chains, manipulating stock prices, or spreading misinformation.

• Compromise and Coercion—using blackmail, financial incentives, or ideological persuasion to secure cooperation.

• Controlled Narratives—the deliberate shaping of public perception through media, propaganda, and selective information dissemination. Intelligence agencies craft narratives to obscure truths, redirect attention, or manufacture consent for geopolitical objectives.

• Corporate Espionage—stealing trade secrets or intellectual property to gain economic superiority.

• Counterintelligence Evasion—avoiding detection while influencing governance from within.

• Counterintelligence Tactics—monitoring adversaries to detect infiltration or manipulation.

• Covert Identities—aliases used to maintain plausible deniability.

• Covert Alliances—intelligence-sharing agreements like Five Eyes (FVEY) to expand surveillance reach.

• Covert Methods—secretive techniques used in intelligence operations to gather information, manipulate outcomes, or execute missions while maintaining plausible deniability.

• Covert Operations—assassinations, sabotage, and intelligence gathering.

• Coup—a covert operation designed to secretly overthrow or destabilise a government or leadership, often through infiltration, deception, and manipulation of key institutions. Executed with precision, a coup may involve intelligence assets, compromised officials, psychological warfare, and false narratives to control the outcome while maintaining plausible deniability. Spy agencies often orchestrate or support coups through proxy actors, misinformation campaigns, or financial leverage, ensuring the transition appears organic rather than engineered.

• Creeping Coup—a gradual, often legal or semi-legal erosion of democratic institutions and governance. It typically involves incremental changes—such as manipulating laws, weakening opposition, or consolidating power—until the original system is effectively dismantled. This type of coup is often carried out by civilian leaders rather than the military.

• Criminal Networks—interconnected groups engaged in illicit activities, often operating across borders and utilising covert methods to evade detection. These networks function like decentralised intelligence operations, leveraging secrecy, deception, and strategic alliances to maintain control and profitability.

• Currency Destabilisation—engineering inflation or devaluation to weaken an economy.

• Cutout—a person used as a distraction to divert attention from the true source of power, wealth, or decision-making. This tactic is often employed to mislead the public or investigators.

• Cyber Espionage—hacking networks, monitoring online activity, and manipulating digital infrastructure.

• Cyber Warfare—hacking, misinformation, and digital sabotage.

• DARVO—Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender—is a psychological manipulation tactic often used in intelligence and espionage circles to deflect blame and control narratives. In spy operations, DARVO can be employed to discredit whistleblowers, manipulate public perception, or obscure covert activities. Intelligence agencies and operatives may use this strategy to shift scrutiny away from their actions, making accusers appear as aggressors while portraying themselves as victims.

• Debt Entrapment—offering financial aid or loans with conditions that compromise sovereignty.

• Deep Cover Operatives—agents embedded within hostile territories for long-term missions.

• Deception & Manipulation—creating false narratives or controlling discourse.

• Deceptive Narratives—carefully crafted misinformation designed to manipulate perceptions, mislead adversaries, or control public discourse. These narratives can be used to obscure true intentions, sow confusion, or redirect attention away from covert operations.

• Diplomatic Intelligence—the covert collection and analysis of political, economic, and strategic information through diplomatic channels. Intelligence officers often operate under official cover, posing as diplomats, trade representatives, or embassy staff to gather intelligence while benefiting from diplomatic immunity.

• Disinformation—spreading false or misleading information.

• Disinformation & Rumours—spreading false narratives to create doubt and paranoia.

• Disinformation Campaigns—spreading false intelligence to mislead adversaries.

• Double Agent Operations—turning enemy spies into assets for controlled misinformation.

• Economic Conse

• quences of Misinformation—poor decision-making in markets, governance, and resource allocation, ultimately harming economic stability.

• Economic Intelligence—monitoring trade agreements, sanctions, and financial policies.

• Economic Manipulation—covert strategies used by intelligence agencies or state actors to influence a nation's financial stability, trade policies, or resource control for geopolitical advantage. It often involves currency destabilisation, sanctions and trade restrictions, debt entrapment, market interference, and corporate espionage.

• Erosion of Trust—a loss of public confidence, resulting in widespread scepticism and disengagement. As a consequence, enemies can exploit the instability to dismantle key institutions and representative government—systems designed to protect everyday people.

• Espionage—the covert collection of intelligence through deception, infiltration, and surveillance to gain strategic advantage over adversaries. It involves the use of spies, informants, and clandestine operations to acquire classified information, disrupt enemy activities, or manipulate geopolitical outcomes.

• Fake—a deliberate deception or fabrication used to mislead adversaries, manipulate intelligence, or obscure the truth. It can involve counterfeit identities, forged documents, staged events, or misinformation campaigns designed to create false narratives.

• Fake Claimer—an individual who falsely assumes someone else's persona—whether for deception, fraud, or manipulation. This can occur in espionage, criminal networks, or online scams.

• False Flag—spreading disinformation while staging events to justify political actions or crackdowns.

• False Flag Operations—missions designed to obscure the true source of activity.

• False Legitimacy—fabricated histories or events used to justify policies, wars, or societal changes.

• Fear & Intimidation—undermining morale and confidence.

• Five Eyes (FVEY)—an intelligence-sharing alliance between Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Established through the UKUSA Agreement, it facilitates joint surveillance, signals intelligence (SIGINT), and covert operations among member nations. Five Eyes operates as a global surveillance network, monitoring communications, cyber activities, and geopolitical developments. It has expanded beyond Cold War-era intelligence gathering to include counterterrorism, cyber espionage, and diplomatic intelligence.

• Fabricated History—deliberately constructed false narratives designed to manipulate public perception, obscure inconvenient truths, or serve strategic interests. These distortions can be used to justify political actions, control populations, or rewrite historical events to favor a particular agenda.

• Front Organisation—a seemingly legitimate entity—such as a business, charity, or research institute—used to conceal intelligence operations. These organisations provide cover for spies, allowing them to operate without drawing suspicion.

• Gammon—a term derived from English that can be glossed in Aboriginal Australia as meaning fake, cheap, or broken. It is shared across varieties of Aboriginal English and has become affectionately revered as an icon of intra-Aboriginal public culture.

• Global Surveillance Operations—large-scale intelligence-gathering efforts conducted by governments, alliances, and intelligence agencies to monitor communications, digital activity, and geopolitical movements worldwide. These operations leverage advanced technology, covert networks, and strategic partnerships to track individuals, organisations, and nations.

  • Global surveillance often involves signals intelligence (SIGINT), cyber espionage, satellite and aerial reconnaissance, mass data collection, and covert alliances.

  • These operations are central to grey zone warfare, allowing nations to exert influence, counter threats, and shape global narratives without direct military engagement.

• Government Infiltration—covert penetration of a governmental institution or agency by intelligence operatives, foreign agents, or ideological actors to manipulate policies, extract classified information, or disrupt internal operations.

• Grey Zone Tactics—manipulative strategies that blur the line between war and peace.

• Grey Zone Warfare—in espionage and covert operations, grey zone warfare refers to strategic actions that fall between traditional war and peace, leveraging deception, influence, and indirect aggression to achieve geopolitical objectives without triggering open conflict. This allows operatives to exert control while maintaining plausible deniability, making retaliation difficult. The goal is to destabilise or influence a target without crossing the threshold into conventional warfare.

• Handlers—in both spy and criminal terminology, refers to a person who manages, directs, or controls an operative, informant, or asset for strategic purposes—whether in intelligence operations or organised crime.

  • In espionage, a handler is an intelligence officer responsible for overseeing spies, informants, or covert assets. They recruit, train, and coordinate missions while ensuring operational security. Handlers use psychological manipulation, tradecraft techniques, and counterintelligence measures to maintain control over their operatives while shielding the agency’s involvement.

  • In criminal networks, a handler manages individuals involved in illegal activities, such as informants, enforcers, or financial operatives. They facilitate covert operations, protect key players, and ensure that those under their control remain loyal and effective. Criminal handlers may also act as intermediaries between street-level operatives and higher-level figures, overseeing financial transactions, logistics, or illicit enterprises.

• Hidden Blackmail—covert coercion tactics where threats or leverage are applied discreetly to manipulate individuals, organisations, or governments without overt exposure. Unlike direct extortion, hidden blackmail operates through subtle pressure, concealed threats, or controlled narratives to ensure compliance while maintaining plausible deniability.

• Hidden Influence—covert manipulation or indirect control exerted over individuals, organisations, or geopolitical events without overt detection. It is a strategic tool used to shape decisions, perceptions, and behaviours while maintaining plausible deniability.

• Hidden Motive—an underlying reason or agenda that is deliberately concealed to manipulate outcomes, influence decisions, or obscure true intentions. It is often used in espionage, politics, and criminal networks to shape events without direct exposure.

• Hidden Tactics—covert strategies used to manipulate outcomes, evade detection, or exert influence without direct confrontation. These methods are designed to operate in secrecy, ensuring plausible deniability while achieving strategic objectives.

• Hidden Wealth—assets, financial resources, or valuables that are deliberately concealed to avoid detection, taxation, or legal scrutiny. This can include offshore accounts, undisclosed investments, secret holdings, or wealth stored in untraceable forms such as cryptocurrency or physical assets.

• Human Intelligence (HUMINT) Operations—intelligence-gathering conducted through human sources rather than technical means. This involves recruiting informants, conducting interrogations, and infiltrating organisations to extract valuable information. HUMINT is distinct from SIGINT (Signals Intelligence) because it relies on human interaction, deception, and psychological manipulation rather than technology.

• Identifying Key Players—the process of mapping influential individuals within a target organisation, government, or covert network to assess their roles, vulnerabilities, and strategic value.

• Influence Operations—shaping foreign policy decisions through covert persuasion.

• Insider Recruitment—refers to the covert process of identifying, influencing, and enlisting individuals within a target organisation or government to act as informants or operatives. A key tool in human intelligence (HUMINT) operations, allowing intelligence agencies to infiltrate organisations while maintaining plausible deniability.

• Institutional Capture—gradually replacing key officials with controlled assets/inside traitors to ensure control over legal, political, and economic systems.

• Intercepted Communications—analysing signals intelligence (SIGINT) to reveal hidden relationships.

• Internal Division—exploiting ideological or personal conflicts within a group to fracture cohesion.

• Limited Hangout—an intelligence tactic used to manage perception and control narratives. It involves revealing a partial truth—often a carefully selected piece of information—to distract from more damaging facts that remain concealed.

• Long-term Grooming—gradually building trust and influence over a potential recruit before activating them.

• Loss of Critical Thinking—when falsehoods become widely accepted, independent thought and rational discourse suffer, making it harder for people to challenge misleading narratives.

• Manufactured consent – A term often used in intelligence and media analysis, referring to the deliberate engineering of public agreement through misinformation.

• Mapping Networks—analysing connections between individuals, organisations, or governments.

• Market Interference—manipulating stock markets, commodities, or supply chains to create instability.

• Mass Data Collection—analysing metadata from social media, financial transactions, and biometric systems.

• Media Control & Covert Influence—manipulating narratives by controlling mainstream media, suppressing dissent, and using hidden influence operations to shape public perception.

• Money Laundering—concealing financial transactions to fund covert activities.

• Morale Disruption—tactics designed to weaken an adversary’s confidence, unity, and effectiveness. Intelligence agencies and covert operatives use various methods, including internal division, disinformation & rumours, sabotage & bureaucratic obstruction, and psychological pressure.

• Network Analysis—tracing connections between operatives, officials, and informants.

• Perception Management—the systematic manipulation of how individuals, organisations, or nations interpret reality. This involves misinformation, psychological operations, and strategic deception to influence emotions, decisions, and behaviours in favour of an intelligence agenda.

• Political Control—misinformation is used to maintain power or justify actions.

• Political Influence Operations—manipulating decision-makers through persuasion, coercion, or deception.

• Political Manipulation—compromised governments can exploit misinformation and lies to justify policies and laws, suppress dissent, and consolidate power.

• Predatory Fraud—a criminal who masquerades as a child advocate while secretly being an abuser is a predatory fraud or a wolf in sheep’s clothing. In legal and psychological contexts, they may be described as a deceptive perpetrator or a groomer, particularly if they exploit their false advocacy to gain trust and access to victims.

• Projection—the psychological tactic where an operative or intelligence agency attributes their own motives, actions, or intentions to an adversary. This can be used to manipulate narratives, justify covert operations, or obscure true objectives.

• Propaganda—influencing opinions through media and messaging.

• Proxy Actors—in espionage and covert operations, proxy actors refer to individuals, organisations, or groups that operate on behalf of a controlling entity—often an intelligence agency or a foreign government—while maintaining plausible deniability.

• Proxy Forces—militias or mercenaries acting on behalf of intelligence agencies.

• Proxy Wars—smaller conflicts orchestrated by larger powers through third-party forces.

• Psychological Manipulation—building trust, exerting influence, or controlling informants through incentives or coercion.

• Psychological Pressure—manipulating emotions through fear, uncertainty, or isolation.

• Psychological Warfare (Psyops)—strategies used to manipulate perceptions, emotions, and behaviours to achieve a strategic goal. Often involves disinformation, propaganda, fear & intimidation, deception & manipulation.

• Public Figure Decoy—a person used to impersonate or divert attention away from a high-profile individual, often for security, political, or intelligence purposes.

• Sabotage & Bureaucratic Obstruction—deliberately slowing down operations or creating inefficiencies.

• Sanctions and Trade Restrictions—using economic pressure to force political concessions.

• Satellite and Aerial Reconnaissance—using imagery intelligence (IMINT) to track movements and infrastructure.

• Scapegoating & Collective Framing—blaming specific groups for crises to divert attention and justify authoritarian measures.

• Secret—classified or concealed information, operations, or identities that are deliberately hidden from unauthorised access.

• Secret Army—covert paramilitary force operating outside conventional military structures, often engaging in clandestine missions, psychological warfare, and asymmetric tactics.

• Secret Coup—a covert and sudden seizure of power, often orchestrated behind the scenes without public awareness until it is too late.

• Secret Criminal Network—covert, decentralised organisation engaged in illicit activities while maintaining secrecy, influence, and operational security.

• Secretive Creeping Coup (Secret Creeping Coup)—a covert and gradual seizure of power in which governance is systematically undermined through hidden influence, legal manoeuvres, and institutional control.

• Shadow War—covert, undeclared conflict where intelligence agencies, proxy actors, and clandestine operations shape geopolitical outcomes without direct military engagement.

• Signals Intelligence (SIGINT)—refers to the covert interception, analysis, and exploitation of electronic communications and signals to gather intelligence.

• Sleeper—Deep cover agent with mission to penetrate highest reaches of target nation or organisation- long term project.

• Social Division—false narratives deepen societal fractures, fuelling polarisation and hostility.

• Social Media Manipulation—deploying bots, fake accounts, and algorithmic strategies to amplify propaganda and suppress opposition.

• Staged Incidents—fabricated events designed to provoke a specific response.

• Strategy of Tension—a tactic used to manipulate public perception by fostering fear, uncertainty, and division. It involves orchestrating crises—such as false flags, civil unrest, or economic instability—to justify government actions, suppress dissent, or shift political power.

• Total War—a warfare doctrine where all national resources—economic, political, and civilian—are mobilised for conflict, disregarding traditional limitations. Intelligence agencies play a crucial role in psychological operations, propaganda, and economic sabotage to weaken adversaries beyond the battlefield.

• Tradecraft—techniques for evasion, surveillance, and secure communication.

• Transnational Operations—criminal activities spanning multiple countries, often linked to intelligence agencies or geopolitical interests.

• UKUSA Agreement—a multilateral intelligence-sharing pact between Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States, collectively known as the Five Eyes (FVEY) alliance. Originally signed in 1946, it formalised cooperation in signals intelligence (SIGINT), enabling member nations to exchange intercepted communications, cryptographic analysis, and surveillance data.

  • Emerging from wartime intelligence collaboration, the agreement expanded over the decades, integrating additional partners in limited capacities.

  • It remained classified for decades, with its existence publicly acknowledged only in 2005.

  • The UKUSA framework continues to underpin global surveillance operations, cyber intelligence, and counterterrorism efforts.

• Unconventional Warfare—guerrilla tactics, sabotage, and intelligence operations.

• Warping Reality—a deliberate manipulation of perception through disinformation, psychological operations, and propaganda to distort facts, create confusion, and control narratives, making it difficult for adversaries or the public to discern truth from deception.

• Wet Job – Murder/ assassination.

1. "We don't know how long ago exactly but grinding dishes [discovered] date back around 65,000 years,” says Pascoe. “So that's an indication that our people may have been cooking bread before the Egyptians – before anyone else thought of it.”

Yasmin Noone, How a Humble Loaf of Bread Made from Native Millet Could Change Lives," SBS Food, https://www.sbs.com.aufood/article/how-a-humble-loaf-of-bread-made-from-native-millet-could-change-lives/ausq7kx6f

“Mr Pascoe also claims the Aboriginals developed democracy well before the ancient Greeks.”

ABC reignites history wars with documentary claiming settlers covered up evidence that Aboriginals were farmers not hunter-gatherers to 'justify white occupation', Daily Mail, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7696403/Bruce-Pascoes-Dark-Emu-reignites-history-wars-claiming-Australians-farmers.html

2. This helped me see that the British ruling class continues to employ the same historical tactics, under a different guise. This time, they are using Indigenous people worldwide as a device in a process of recolonisation, advancing a master plan for total corporate feudal, control, over everything.

Recolonisation, both historically and today, operates through several key mechanisms:

1. Break up nations – Imposing borders and engineering divisions to ensure governance remains fragile, making resistance harder to sustain.

2. Asset-strip – Deliberately draining resources to leave nations economically crippled, preventing opposition from mounting any resistance.

3. Deconstructing governance systems – Create political instability by employing divide-and-rule tactics, scapegoating specific groups to divert attention.

4. Install enemy combatants–Placing compromised figures in positions of power to ensure governments serve external interests rather than their populations.

3. British Empire played a central role in the partition and division of both Ireland. India and Palestine using political fragmentation as a strategic tool of control.

• Ireland: The Government of Ireland Act 1920 led to the partition of Ireland, creating Northern Ireland and the Irish Free State (later the Republic of Ireland). This division reinforced British influence in the north while attempting to manage Irish nationalist movements.

• India: The 1947 partition of British India resulted in the creation of India and Pakistan (later leading to Bangladesh’s independence in 1971). This division fueled communal tensions, mass displacement, and ongoing geopolitical conflicts.

• Under the British Mandate for Palestine, which began in 1920, Britain administered the region following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. However, tensions between Jewish and Arab communities escalated, particularly after the Balfour Declaration of 1917, which supported a Jewish national home in Palestine.

  By 1947, Britain referred the issue to the United Nations, leading to the UN Partition Plan, which proposed separate Jewish and Arab states. Britain officially ended its mandate on May 14, 1948, paving the way for the establishment of Israel and the subsequent Arab-Israeli conflict.

• Middle East, Ottoman Empire Dissolution: After World War I, Britain and France divided Ottoman territories under the Sykes-Picot Agreement (1916), creating artificial borders that still influence regional tensions today.

4. Richard Poe: Globalism Rooted in British Liberal Imperialism, Not American Empire, Geopolitics & Empire, February 22, 2023, https://geopoliticsandempire.com/2021/05/08/richard-poe-globalism-rooted-in-british-liberal-imperialism-not-american-empire/

5. The Empire 2.0: UN-veiling the Global Plot of Recolonisation

6. Nugget Coombs on Indigenous Self-Determination: Reserve Bank of Australia. Dr H.C. Coombs and Australia's First Nations. https://museum.rba.gov.au/exhibitions/hccoombs-and-first-australians/

For commentary on the right to secession under self-determination, see: Abel, Mia. Is There a Right to Secession in International Law? E-International Relations: https://www.e-ir.info/2020/05/18/is-there-a-right-to-secession-in-international-law/

7. Herbert Cole (Nugget) Coombs Trial Balance. South Melbourne: Macmillan, 1981. page 141 https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/catalog/1610935

8. Adam LeBor, "How Bankers Helped the Nazis," Sydney Morning Herald, August 1, 2013, https://www.smh.com.au/business/how-bankers-helped-the-nazis-20130801-2r1fd.html

9. To understand how the British acted as the hidden hand behind the emergence of communism, see Richard Poe’s How the British Invented Communism (And Blamed It on the Jews) (2024). https://www.amazon.com.au/British-Invented-Communism-Blamed-Jews/dp/B0D46BB4WV

The Old Empire wants us back in Chains

Always hold hope in your hearts

10. Rio Tinto is one of WWF's corporate funders. The relationship between Rio Tinto and WWF is also evidenced by their interaction regarding protected forest areas. The contexts show that Rio Tinto is listed among other major corporate funders including BHP-Billiton, Chevron, and others who provide financial support to WWF.

When you consider The average global life expectancy remained stagnant at around thirty for nearly 8,000 years until the 1800s. Then, in less than 200 years, it more than doubled to over seventy. What changed in the 1800s? We began using oil and coal, leading to the advent of electricity. Thousands of products derived from crude oil have significantly improved both the quality and longevity of human life. Than the claim can be made these environmental movements are lying and doomsday.

Rosling, Hans, Ola Rosling, and Anna Rosling Rönnlund. Factfulness: Ten Reasons We’re Wrong about the World - and Why Things Are Better than You Think. London, England: Sceptre, 2019. p.166-7

11. These rates can differ based on factors such as production method, market conditions, and government regulations:

• Coal: 7–10% (please note WA has a tiered pricing structure)

• Iron ore: 3.75–5%

• Gold: 2.5–5%

• Copper: 2.5–5%

• Nickel: 2.5–5%.

12. Britain plays a significant role in global tax avoidance through its network of overseas territories. Research indicates that 8 out of the 10 biggest tax havens are British territories, including the British Virgin Islands, Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, Jersey, and Guernsey. These jurisdictions enable corporate tax avoidance on a massive scale, with the UK itself ranked as a major facilitator of offshore financial secrecy.

British tax havens play a significant role in global financial secrecy, enabling illicit activities such as money laundering, tax evasion, and black market trade. Reports suggest that these offshore jurisdictions—such as the British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, and Jersey—are used by corporations and individuals to obscure financial transactions, making it easier to move funds linked to illegal activities.

How British Island tax havens accommodate financial criminals: A historical perspective on how British tax havens have enabled financial crime from 1956 to 2020.

British tax havens dodging reform: An analysis of how British Overseas Territories resist transparency measures, allowing tax abuse and financial secrecy.

London: A global haven for criminal financial activity: A report on how billions of pounds are laundered through British banks daily, making the UK a hotspot for financial crime.

13. Australia Institute. Australia’s Small Mining Industry. 12 December, 2024. https://australiainstitute.org.au/post/australias-small-mining-industry/

14. The British Empire frequently deconstructed governance systems and installed ruling-class intermediaries loyal to colonial rule, some examples:

• India – The Princely States – The British maintained indirect control by allowing local rulers to govern under British oversight. These rulers were often dependent on British support, ensuring loyalty to colonial interests.

• Nigeria – Indirect Rule – British authorities used traditional chiefs to administer colonial policies, weakening indigenous governance structures while maintaining imperial control.

• Kenya – Divide and Rule – The British favoured certain ethnic groups for administrative roles, creating divisions that undermined unified resistance against colonial rule.

• Egypt – British Protectorate – Britain installed loyal administrators and controlled key sectors, ensuring that governance remained aligned with imperial interests.

• Malaya – British Advisors – The British placed advisors within local governance structures, influencing decisions while maintaining the appearance of native rule.

15. During the COVID era, representative government was effectively suspended. After the 'WHO emergency declaration,' a legal mechanism was triggered that undermined democratic processes. Compromised elected representatives inserted UN emergency policies into domestic laws—silencing the voice of everyday people.

Under this system, COVID-era tyranny stripped away freedoms—without debate, checks, balances, or legal recourse. When public sector oversight disappears, accountability vanishes. Likewise, a privately controlled system eliminates all mechanisms for transparency.

Part of COVID was a psychological operation—conditioning the public to abandon faith in the public sector after it failed to provide protection.

Specifically in Australia, Section 477 of the Biosecurity Act 2015 grants the Health Minister emergency powers, enabling authoritarian measures. following a World Health Organization declaration.

This paper proves the covid measure where a direct result of international interference: Law and Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, 2021.https://disasterlaw.ifrc.org/sites/default/files/media/disaster_law/2021-07/20210617_Law%20and%20PHE%20Preparedness%20and%20Response.pdf)

It is evident that dismantling representative government is a necessary step in establishing global governance. Something Charles III has devoted his life to implementing.

16. The response of the Australian Government to the Final Report of the Joint Standing Committee on Northern Australia regarding the devastation of Indigenous cultural sites at Juukan Gorge, and the Interim Report titled "And Never Again: Investigation into the demolition of ancient caves at Juukan Gorge in the Pilbara region of Western Australia" - November 2022, available at reference (16) on the website https://onevoiceaustralia.com.au/juukan,

UNESCO was founded by Julian Huxley, a eugenicist.

Heritage is mention 218 times. Intangible is mentioned 18 times. In recommendation 2 related to full implementation of UNESCO. 2003. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO, https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/15164-EN.pdf Australian Government to the Final Report of the Joint Standing Committee on Northern Australia regarding the devastation of Indigenous cultural sites at Juukan Gorge, and the Interim Report titled "And Never Again: Investigation into the demolition of ancient caves at Juukan Gorge in the Pilbara region of Western Australia" - November 2022, available at reference (16) on the website https://onevoiceaustralia.com.au/juukan.

UNDRIP is mentioned 7 times. It is referred to in relation to recommendations: 2,3,4, 13 and 14 which all seek to introduce UNDRIP in the new proposed law. The goal is to hinder land development, farming, mining, and business growth within Australia. This will cease all revenue streams for the nation and lead to a financial breakdown. The intention is to strip Australia of its assets, allowing billionaire globalist traitors (who control our compromised political class) to reap the benefits, just as they are doing in Africa.

Spelt out United Nations Declaration on the Rights of indigenous People (UNDRIP) and UNESCO intangible Heritage Laws - part of the Agenda 21/30 master plan is to be implemented world wide. Designed to destroy Nations.

UNDRIP was devised to break up nations into First Nations. The social inclusion branch of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs released the United Nations Declaration on The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples on 13 September 2007. The implementation plan and UNRIP declaration are available for download at referenced as (17): https://onevoiceaustralia.com.au/juukan.

17. In an act of inversion (DARVO), fake claimer Bruce Pascoe’s essay argued for a UN governance model across the world:

“The imposition of the West’s superiority is still alive today and was made explicit in 2007, when the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples by a vote of a hundred and forty-three to four. Who were the four? The US, Canada, New Zealand and Australia: the colonial governments who have most to lose if rights are extended to the indigenous.”

Pascoe, Bruce. "The Imperial Mind: How Europeans Stole the World." In First Things First, Griffith Review, vol. 60, 2018. 234-243 at p. 240. https://www.griffithreview.com/articles/the-imperial-mind-how-europeans-stole-the-world-pascoe/

18. UNDRIP rejects a formal definition of indigenous peoples, State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples: Implementing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.2020. New York: United Nations, https://social.un.org/unpfii/sowip-vol4-web.pdf, page 6, also at reference (28), https://onevoiceaustralia.com.au/juukan

19. Micheal McKenna, ‘Modern day blacktrackers’, The Weekend Australian, 20 February 2016, https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/inquirer/laurinne-campbells-claim-to-aboriginality-sparks-investigation/news-story/5fa0af56b656fa815ffbf74d965287a3

20. Oxfam International. Takers, Not Makers: Wealth Extraction from India During Colonialism. 20 January 2025, https://www.livemint.com/news/india/richest-10-got-over-half-of-64-82-trillion-uk-extracted-from-india-during-colonialism-study-11737337373125.html

21. For the Gold output of Africa, see Doris Dokua SasuMine Production of Gold in Africa from 2011 to 2021, Statista, 27 May 2025. https://www.statista.com/statistics/508145/african-gold-mine-production/#:~:text=The%20total%20gold%20mine%20production,tons%20of%20gold%20in%202023.

“Furthermore, the continent has 40 percent of the world’s gold, up to 90 percent of its chromium and platinum, and the largest reserves of cobalt, diamonds, platinum, and uranium. Africa holds 65 percent of the world’s arable land and 10 percent of its internal renewable fresh water sources. Global Environment Facility. The GEF in Africa. 2024. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/gef-africa#:~:text=Furthermore%2C%20the%20continent%20has%2040,internal%20renewable%20fresh%20water%20sources.

22. Terra Carta: Licence to Kill

23. The British Empire has historically relied on secrecy as a strategic tool in warfare, using deception, intelligence operations, and classified policies to maintain control and influence. Here are some key examples:

• Operation Legacy: In the 1950s, Britain systematically removed or destroyed incriminating documents from its colonies before granting them independence. This ensured that records of colonial abuses, including torture and forced labor, were hidden from public scrutiny: Cobain, Ian. The History Thieves: Secrets, Lies and the Shaping of a Modern Nation. London: Portobello Books Ltd, 2016. See summary here: https://theconversation.com/operation-legacy-how-britain-covered-up-its-colonial-crimes-225330

• State Secrecy in Imperial Wars: British officials deliberately concealed the extent of their military interventions, particularly in conflicts like the Mau Mau uprising in Kenya. Colonial authorities suppressed evidence of human rights abuses, maintaining a sanitised version of events.

  https://jacobin.com/2016/11/british-empire-kenya-oman-ireland-state-secrecy/

• Covert Intelligence Operations: The British Empire relied heavily on espionage, misinformation, and covert military actions to destabilise opponents and maintain control over territories. This included secret agreements, propaganda campaigns, and hidden military deployments.

24. Private military contractors played a significant role in modern conflicts, particularly in Iraq and Afghanistan. Reports indicate that in Iraq, there was at least one contractor for every American soldier. Armstrong, Martin. Mercenaries – the New Way to Fight Wars. Armstrong Economics, August 22, 2024. https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/war/mercenaries-the-new-way-to-fight-wars/

In Afghanistan, contractors made up 70% of U.S. forces. Schwartz, Moshe. Department of Defense Contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan: Background and Analysis. Congressional Research Service, July 2, 2010. https://www.refworld.org/reference/themreport/uscrs/2010/en/76090

In World War II, where only 10% of forces were contracted: Schwartz, Moshe. Department of Defense Contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan: Background and Analysis. Congressional Research Service, July 2, 2010. https://nation.time.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2011/04/uscontractorsinwarzones2.pdf

25. Gilbert, Rosa. "Erasing Empire." Tribune Magazine, June 12, 2020. https://jacobin.com/2016/11/british-empire-kenya-oman-ireland-state-secrecy/

26

27. David Pegg and Paul Lewis, "How the British Royal Family Hides Its Wealth from Public Scrutiny," The Guardian, 5 April 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/05/how-the-british-royal-family-hides-its-wealth-from-public-scrutiny#img-1,

28. Royal Secrets, It's time to end royal secrecy, Republic https://www.republic.org.uk/royal_secrets

29. George Venturini (2011, December 26). The Commonwealth of Nations: An Uncommon Wealth. Countercurrents. https://countercurrents.org/venturini261211.pdf, cited at, Richard Poe, [@RealRichardPoe]. (18 May 2023). The King inherited his wealth from his mother, the Queen, in relation to the Queen’s shareholding. Twitter. https://x.com/RealRichardPoe/status/1659142826012160000;

30. Charles corporate indoctrination charity seeks to re-educate business leaders on how they should be directing their financial resources. Only to those who follow the masterplan. Those involved in the King’s plan include George Soros’s Open Society Foundation, that has been linked to political movements and power shifts worldwide. The initiative also includes major multinational corporations on its executive directorate, featuring companies from the United States, Britain, Germany, Japan, Australia, and other countries.

Joan M. Veon, Prince Charles: The Sustainable Prince (Oklahoma City, OK: Hearthstone Publishing, 1997) https://web.archive.org/web/20070111083939/http://www.despatch.cth.com.au/Despatch/Vol93_Charles_sustainable.htm

31.

32. Joan M. Veon, Prince Charles: The Sustainable Prince (Oklahoma City, OK: Hearthstone Publishing, 1997) https://web.archive.org/web/20070111083939/http://www.despatch.cth.com.au/Despatch/Vol93_Charles_sustainable.htm

“Prince Charles is literally related to everyone of royal blood in the world, along with a few who are not, like Charles Darwin. According to the English genealogist Gerald Paget, who spent most of his 92 years tracing the lineage of Queen Elizabeth and Prince Charles, “HRH’s [Prince Charles] breeding is the most important in the world ... he is heir to the world’s greatest position that is determined solely by heredity.” (9) In the introduction to Paget’s monumental work, The Lineage & Ancestry of H.R.H. Prince Charles of Wales, Paget writes, “His Royal Highness is cousin or nephew, in varying degrees, of all the six wives of King Henry VIII. He has many descents from the royal houses of Scotland, France, Germany, Austria, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, Spain, Portugal, Russia and the Netherlands ... in addition to Charlemagne and William the Conqueror, he numbers amongst his ancestors such historic characters as King Alfred the Great, King Harold, who was slain at Hastings, Llewelyn the Great Prince of North Wales, Owain Glyndwr, Warwick the Kingmaker, Margaret, Countess of Salisbury (the last of the Plantagenets), the Protector Edward Seymour, the Duke of Somerset and his rival John Dudley, Duke of Northumberland ... Louis IX, King of France, the Emperor Rudolph of Hapsburg, Catherine I, Empress of Russia, Robert Bruce, Mary Queen of Scots...” (10) Paget notes, “Links through marriages or a common ancestor can be found to such diverse people as Genghis Khan and twelve Presidents of the United States of America (for the last see Burke’s Presidential Families of the United States of America).” (11)

Prince Charles biographer, Anthony Holden, goes further and explains that Prince Charles “descends over and over again from Charlemagne and Frederick Barbarossa and all the great dynasties, Hapsburg and Hohenstaufen, Guleph and Hohenzollern, Bavaria, and Saxony, Hesse and Baden ... in Italy, his forefathers include the Dukes of Savoy and the Emperor Frederick II ... and the medieval Kings of Sicily, as also the Orsini of Rome (Pope Nicholas III was his ancestral uncle)... in Spain, they include Ferdinand and Isabella ... and thus El Cid himself. The Prince’s Anglo-Saxon and Danish royal forefathers sprang from Dark Age kings who incarnated the storm-spirit Woden (after whom Wednesday is named), and among his pagan Celtic royal forefathers were King Niall of the Nine Hostages and the Dynamic Iron Age sacral kings of Tara, the great sanctuary of ancient Ireland. Through the Lusignan crusader kings of Cyprus, titular kings of Jerusalem, Prince Charles descends a millennium further back from king Tiridates the Great, the first Christian monarch of all (under whom Armenia was converted in AD 314, before even Rome itself), and thus from the divine Parthian Imperial House of Arsaces (247 BC), which reigned over Persia and Babylonia and was in its time the mightiest dynasty in the Ancient World.” (12)”

33. Katharina Buchholz, "Number of Coups Up But Still Behind Historical Highs," Statista, February 19, 2025, https://www.statista.com/chart/11905/number-of-registered-coups-attempted-coups-and-conspiracies/

34. SPYSCAPE, Prince Harry: Explosive Spy Secrets from His Tell-All Royal Book, n.d. https://spyscape.com/article/prince-harry-explosive-spy-secrets-from-tell-all-royal-books

35. Chris Moore, Kincora: Britain’s Shame – Mountbatten, MI5, the Belfast Boys’ Home Sex Abuse Scandal and the British Cover-Up (Irish Academic Press, 2025), See also, Chris Moore, "New Claims Mountbatten Sexually Abused Children from Notorious Belfast Boys' Home," The Journal, May 16, 2025. https://www.thejournal.ie/new-book-lord-mountbatten-kincora-sexual-abuse-6706653-May2025/

36. Brian O'Neill, "New Book Exposes Lord Mountbatten’s Alleged Abuse of Children from Kincora," Slugger O'Toole, May 16, 2025. https://sluggerotoole.com/2025/05/16/new-book-exposes-lord-mountbattens-abuse-of-children-from-kincora/

37. Chris Moore, "Home of Horror: How MI5 Protected Child Sex Abusers in the Notorious Kincora Boys’ Home," Sunday World, December 4, 2022, https://www.sundayworld.com/crime/irish-crime/how-mi5-protected-child-sex-abusers-in-the-notorious-kincora-boys-home/864627602.html

38. Adrian Rutherford, "Secret Kincora Boys' Home Files Will Not Be Released for 66 Years," Belfast Telegraph, September 15, 2019. https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/secret-kincora-boys-home-files-will-not-be-released-for-66-years/38500415.html

39. Jon Stone, "Royal Family Member Was Investigated as Part of Paedophile Ring Before Cover-Up, Ex-Cop Says," The Independent, March 23, 2015, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/royal-family-member-was-investigated-as-part-of-paedophile-ring-before-coverup-excop-says-10126864.html

40. United Nations. Agenda 21: Programme of Action for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations, 1992. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21#:~:text=Agenda%2021%2C%20the%20Rio%20Declaration,3%20to%2014%20June%201992.

41. Mark Musser, Green Lebensraum: The Nazi Roots of Sustainable Development (January 27, 2012). https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2012/01/green_lebensraum_the_nazi_roots_of_sustainable_development.html

“Climate change created by a Nazi: “Yet again, it is no coincidence that as far as the Nazi Party was concerned, the majority of its members were Greens. Nazi leadership championed renewable energy with fervour. The leading forefather of the climate hoax was Guenther Schwab (1902-2006) an Austrian Nazi.

His 1958 fictional book sparked the climate hoax pseudoscience myth. That carbon dioxide levels would continue to rise, leading to climate change. This included the lies of thawing of polar ice, rising ocean levels, and flooding of continents due to the climate hoax.

Schwab established an international environmental organisation thanks to his fictions meteoric rise. Schwab's organisation led to the establishment of the German Green Party in 1980.”

I can't breathe: UN subversion suffocating Australians

42. Richard Moore, as head of MI6, said that climate change is the "foremost international foreign policy agenda item" for both the UK and the planet. MI6 has even engaged in "green spying"—monitoring major polluters to ensure they uphold their climate commitments. Sky News, "MI6 'Green Spying' on Biggest Polluters to Ensure Nations Keep Climate Change Promises," Sky News, April 30, 2021, https://news.sky.com/story/mi6-green-spying-on-biggest-polluters-to-ensure-nations-keep-climate-change-promises-12286458

43. Jim Macgregor and John O’Dowd, Two World Wars and Hitler: Who Was Responsible?: Anglo-American Money, Foreign Agents, and Geopolitics (Walterville, OR: TrineDay, 2025), https://www.amazon.com/Two-World-Wars-Hitler-Anglo-American/dp/1634245032

44. Pauline Mazumdar, Eugenics, Human Genetics and Human Failings: The Eugenics Society, Its Sources and Its Critics in Britain (London: Routledge, 1992), 2.

45. “In the 1930s, National Socialism spawned the ecological cult of sustainable development. This was particularly true with regard to Nazi sustainable forestry practices, environmental social engineering over private property, and the concept of spatial planning over entire landscapes. While environmental historians often use Hitler’s Four Year economic war plan from 1936-40 to demonstrate the Nazis were not all that green, they have failed, perhaps willfully so, to grasp that it was precisely the tension between green Nazism and Nazi racism that helped usher into the Third Reich what is otherwise known today as sustainable development.”

Musser, Mark. The Long Green Nazi Shadow over Albert Speer Jr. American Thinker, 23 April 2016 https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/04/the_long_green_nazi_shadow_over_albert_speer_jr.html

Musser, Mark. Green Lebensraum: The Nazi Roots of Sustainable Development. American Thinker, 27 January 2012. https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2012/01/green_lebensraum_the_nazi_roots_of_sustainable_development.html

46. “…it is no coincidence that as far as the Nazi Party was concerned, the majority of its members were Greens. Nazi leadership championed renewable energy with fervour. The leading forefather of the climate hoax was Guenther Schwab (1902-2006) an Austrian Nazi.

His 1958 fictional book sparked the climate hoax pseudoscience myth. That carbon dioxide levels would continue to rise, leading to climate change. This included the lies of thawing of polar ice, rising ocean levels, and flooding of continents due to the climate hoax.

Schwab established an international environmental organisation thanks to his fictions meteoric rise. Schwab's organisation led to the establishment of the German Green Party in 1980.”

I can't breathe: UN subversion suffocating Australians

47. A Controlled Media Operation Silencing our Voice

48. Optional Viewing," Mark McMurtrie & the Events Behind His Disastrous ATSIC Case, the 1st 7 Years, 1992-99, YouTube video, 2022,

49. The British Royal Family has historically maintained strong ties to Freemasonry, with several monarchs—including King George VI and King Edward VII—serving as Grand Masters. Freemasonry functions as a tool for secret influence, deeply embedded within the British ruling class. This connection helps explain how a small island nation exert significant global influence.

50. Sascha Stone in the below mentioned clip came to my attention when he abused an elder and me online after I exposed McMurtrie. Stone is connected to the United Nations and founded an organisation called the, NewEarth Institute, complete with cult symbolism and a charter to implement a global framework for planetary control: Agenda 21/2030 masterplan.The NewEarth Trust claims property over law, landmass, education, finance & commerce, buildings, projects, and landmass ecosystems.

McMurtrie’s accomplice Sascha Stone is part of the British ruling class. His father was head of psychological operations for the British and the Director of the London School of Economics. Stone’s dad Sir Walter Adams, a British Intelligence officer MI6:

• 1942-1944: Deputy Head of the British Political Warfare Mission

• 1945: Order of the British Empire

• 1945: Assistant Deputy Director-General of the Political Intelligence Department of the Foreign Office

• 1946-1955: Secretary of the Inter-University Council for Higher Education in the Colonies

• 1952: Companion of the Order of St. Michael & St George

• 1955-1967: Principal of the College of Rhodesia

• 1967-1974: Director of the London School of Economics

• 1970: Knighted

The “blueprint” on the New Earth Project website contains several references to the UN, notably the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) established by the UNEP Founding Executive Director Maurice Strong, a close associate of the criminal mastermind King Charles III (aka the Sustainable Prince). https://newearthproject.org/wp-content/assets/docs/ne_blueprint.pdf

51. Philip Willan, Puppetmasters: The Political Use of Terrorism in Italy (iUniverse, 2002), 48

52. VICE. World's Scariest Drug (Documentary Exclusive). Internet Archive, May 11, 2012.

53. For the Nazi’s use of scopolamine in WW2, see is Lifton, R. J. (1986, September 21). The Nazi doctors: Medical killing and the psychology of genocide. The New York Times Magazine. https://www.nytimes.com/1986/09/21/magazine/german-doctors-and-the-final-solution.html.

During World War II, scopolamine was used on individuals with mental illness. See E. Fuller Torrey and Robert H. Yolken, "Psychiatric Genocide: Nazi Attempts to Eradicate Schizophrenia," Schizophrenia Bulletin 36, no. 1 (2010): 26–32”

"In the German Third Reich, medicine became an instrument of Nazi political philosophy, incorporating racial purification through biological measures. This included an involuntary euthanasia program targeting mentally and physically disabled children. One such initiative was carried out at Am Spiegelgrund Hospital in Vienna under the direction of Dr Heinrich Gross".”

Child euthanasia in Vienna, the exploitation of scientific materials for personal and professional gain, and postwar efforts to reconcile with this dark chapter of history. Alois Kaufmann, a survivor of Am Spiegelgrund, likened the Nazi approach to child euthanasia to a predator-prey dynamic. According to Kaufmann, every two to three weeks, the weakest children were selected from the group and never seen again. Those chosen first were 'the bedwetters, the children with hare lips, or slow thinkers' (Thomas, 2006).https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbp097Thomas, F. P. (2006). "A cold wind coming": Heinrich Gross and child euthanasia in Vienna. Journal of Child Neurology, 21(4), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/08830738060210040101

54

55. Richard Weikart, Hitler's Religion: The Twisted Beliefs that Drove the Third Reich (Washington, DC: Regnery History, 2016), at page 52:

“Hitler was a savvy politician who recognized the negative repercussions of offending the German people’s religious feelings. He tried to curry favor by portraying himself as a coreligionist both to Christian audiences in public speeches and to anti-Christian Nazi Party leaders. In order to avoid schisms within his party, he usually emphasized religious neutrality. However, in his inner circle he often criticized specific religious positions. Even though he rather frequently attacked Christianity, he rarely if ever explained clearly what he believed about religion. He was a religious chameleon, a quintessential religious hypocrite.:

56. Richard Weikart, Hitler's Religion: The Twisted Beliefs that Drove the Third Reich (Washington, DC: Regnery History, 2016), at page 14:

“When Hitler explained how he hoped to harmonize human society with the scientific laws of nature, he emphasized principles derived from Darwinian theory, especially the racist forms of Darwinism prominent among Darwin’s German disciples. These laws included human biological inequality (especially racial inequality), the human struggle for existence, and natural selection. In the Darwinian struggle for existence, multitudes perish, and only a few of the fittest individuals survive and reproduce. If this is nature’s way, Hitler thought, then he should emulate nature by destroying those destined for death. Thus, in his twisted vision of religion, Hitler believed he was serving his God by annihilating the allegedly inferior humans and promoting the welfare and prolific reproduction of the supposedly superior Aryans.”

57. Jason Momoa Backs Voice To Parliament Yes Vote In Powerful Instagram Post, The Project, 5 Oct 2023.

58. The Australian people say NO

59. Our legislators signed onto the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, directly affecting Indigenous Australians—without consulting the public. ATSIC was created to comply with this international directive, stripping citizens of any input. Both sides of parliament passed the legislation establishing ATSIC—without Aboriginal people’s consent. This is an international agenda.

The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC) was a key body in Australia aimed at addressing the specific needs and rights of Indigenous Australians, including those outlined in international human rights treaties like the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). ATSIC played a vital role in monitoring the effectiveness of programs and developing policies to ensure the realisation of Indigenous rights as recognised under the ICCPR.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner. 2000. Social Justice Report 2000: Chapter 3—International Scrutiny of Australia's Indigenous Affairs Policies. Sydney: Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/publications/social-justice-report-2000-chapter-3-international-scrutiny-australias#:~:text=To%20'enable%20the%20State%20party,%5B17%5D%20in%20the%20treaty.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC). 2000. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and Australia's Obligations under the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: A Report Submitted by the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee. Indigenous Law Resources 10, https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/other/IndigLRes/2000/10.html#:~:text=ATSIC%20(%20Aboriginal%20and%20Torres%20Strait%20Islander,consequences%20for%20the%20rights%20of%20Indigenous%20Australians.

60. There are a web of NGOs in Aboriginal Australia. The Australian Government reported that in 2023, 3,338 corporations were registered under the Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act. These corporations have the lowest governance levels of any Australian-registered body. Office of the Registrar of Indigenous Corporations, Registrar of Indigenous Corporations Annual Report 2022–23 (Canberra: ORIC, 2023): https://www.transparency.gov.au/publications/prime-minister-and-cabinet/national-indigenous-australians-agency/national-indigenous-australians-agency-annual-report-2022-23/section-6%3A-appendices-/appendix-f---registrar-of-indigenous-corporations-annual-report-2022%E2%80%9323

Australia spends an estimated $5.9 billion annually on Aboriginal programs, yet fewer than 10 percent—only 88 of the 1,082 initiatives—have been evaluated during or after implementation. Yet this web of public sector funding fails to meet community needs. The lack of evaluation regarding how public funds are used for Aboriginal Australia suggests that the money is being diverted toward other purposes.

61. Notably Packer has entangled Benjamin Netanyahu in corruption charges.

More about Andrew Forrest here:

White brotherhood billionaires are using Indigenous peoples worldwide as the device to gain control over the world

62. After the blast, the UN raised awareness about the Juukan Hoax, encouraging people to assert that Australia had committed genocide. Royce Kurmelovs, Cultural Genocide’: Australian State Putting Industry Before Heritage, Indigenous Women Tell UN." The Guardian, 6 July, 2022: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/jul/06/cultural-genocide-australian-state-putting-industry-before-heritage-indigenous-women-tell-un#:~:text='Cultural%20genocide':%20Australian%20state,image%20Previous%20image%20Toggle%20caption

63. See the submission here:

Facts: The Juukan cave manipulation and disinformation operation

64. In July 2023, I wrote to the government, but they refused to provide a reason for rejecting the publication of the submission proving Juukan was a hoax. I also contacted every Federal representative, urging them to release the submission, yet I have not received a single response. See here:

“You are beholden to the Australian people immediately to act upon the following:

1. An explanation as to why this submission from a member of the public was not published (see link below): https://josephinecashman.substack.com/p/the-facts-the-juukan-cave-manipulation-disinformation-operation”

See here:

A Message to Our Rulers: dispatched on 4th June 2023 to all federal representatives

65. Australians face a challenge in defending themselves from their government

See here for information on the $800 million payout:

Secret $800M+ payout for a Hoax

66. It was not a men's or women's sacred site, as men are forbidden from entering women’s sites, and vice versa.

This is proven by the fact that, from 2009 to 2015, all items were removed from Juukan by local Aboriginal men and women. The Juukan artifacts are currently stored in a container at a Rio Tinto site. The local Aboriginal corporation never claimed the Juukan contents—Aboriginal people were simply paid to remove and store them.

67. For a span of 17 years, the Native Title Corporation, acting on behalf of the local Aboriginal community, was aware of the plan to destroy Juukan Caves but did not voice any objection. On October 3, 2013, Rio Tinto sent an email to the local Native Title Corporation, attaching an initial proposal to the Western Australian Government for the demolition of Juukan (approved by Rio Tinto CEO Sam Walsh). The email also included various documents highlighting the involvement of experts and dialogues with representatives from the local Aboriginal corporation. On October 17, 2013, Rio officially notified the Native Title Corporation of their intention to detonate the Juukan site. The email included several maps: 'Land Map', 'Purpose Map', 'Previous Surveys Map', and 'Location Map'

Rio Tinto. 2020. Inquiry into the Destruction of 46,000-Year-Old Caves at the Juukan Gorge in the Pilbara Region of Western Australia, Submission 25, Page 22, Paragraph 130. Australia: Rio Tinto. reference (1) at https://onevoiceaustralia.com.au/juukan

68. Both Builth’s and Pascoe’s invention of history has been thoroughly debunked in this peer-reviewed book, authored by respected experts: Sutton, Peter, and Keryn A. Walshe. Farmers or Hunter-Gatherers? The Dark Emu Debate. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing, 2021.

69. Below mention quote, from Builth, Heather. 2009. "Intangible Heritage of Indigenous Australians: A Victorian Example." Journal of Historic Environment 22 (3), page 25. Download here at reference (27) https://onevoiceaustralia.com.au/juukan

70. The plan to plunder "Treasure Island" UN-ravels

71. See, Miranda Devine, Foreign-funded green groups could take whole swathes of Australia out of the productive economy, The Daily Telegraph, 30 October 2016; Dennis Shanahan, Trail leads to John Podesta Green campaign against Australian coal, The Australian, 28 October 2016, https://onevoiceaustralia.com.au/wikileaks

The plan to plunder "Treasure Island" UN-ravels

72. Facts: The Juukan cave manipulation and disinformation operation

73. Treasonist politicians collaborate with the globalists land grab plot

74. The process begins in Western Australia, the leading grain-growing state. With varied climatic conditions and resources support a wide range of agricultural production, including meat, dairy, wool, horticulture, and more. Western Australia's agricultural sector, particularly grains, is a major contributor to the state's economy and Australia's overall output.

75. A false claimed that eel traps were evidence of Aboriginal farming—a deception that led UNESCO, to take control of Australian land by designating it as a heritage site based on false research.

76. Julian Huxley, UNESCO: its purpose and its philosophy, The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), 1946. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000068197

77. Below mention quote, from Builth, Heather. 2009. "Intangible Heritage of Indigenous Australians: A Victorian Example." Journal of Historic Environment 22 (3), page 24. Download here at reference (27) https://onevoiceaustralia.com.au/juukan

78. Non-compliance may result in a fine of $10 million for businesses and up to $1 million in fines or imprisonment for individuals for a maximum of five years, at section 72, Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2021, page 76, The Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2021, section 72, reference (10), can be found at https://onevoiceaustralia.com.au/juukan

79. In February 2007, the Australian Crime Commission (ACC) established the National Indigenous Intelligence Task Force (NIITF), which operated from 2007 to 2014. See the summary report referenced as (18) on the website https://onevoiceaustralia.com.au/juukan for more details about the NIITF.

Those who decide whether a farmer can put up a fence have been described as operating like organised crime. How does this work? As mentioned above, after a seven-year investigation involving 1,000 stakeholder meetings with Aboriginal groups, the Australian Crime Commission found that the Aboriginal industry—specifically native title corporations—is run by organised crime.

80. The government creates atrocities and then shames us into changing the Constitution

81. Terra Carta: Licence to Kill

82. Commonwealth of Australia, House of Representatives Hansard, 29th Parliament, 1st Session, August 7, 1974, https://historichansard.net/hofreps/1974/19740807_reps_29_hor89/#debate-4

83

See here

84. National Archives of Australia. A Plan to Develop Australia’s Minerals and Energy Resources, The Loans Affair, 1974–75. https://www.naa.gov.au/help-your-research/fact-sheets/loans-affair-1974-75

85. Here’s a copy of the letter:

A Message to Our Rulers: dispatched on 4th June 2023 to all federal representatives