This week's exposure of the Canberra UNi-party is a stunning and sobering revelation. The LNP, now UN-ashamedly in tandem with the ALP, are collaborating to surrender Australia into a dystopian ghetto archipelago of UN 15-minute Smart cities in preparation for the world's 0.001% wealthy families to strip our assets.
What gets me, even here in the states, is we supposedly live under the rule of law and our constitution and founding documents. Just because some idiots with god complexes get in and trash these documents doesn’t mean we, the people have to go along with something violating said founding documents. Why not throw these bums out by any means possible, tell them to go to hell, and make sure those backfilling the vacated offices know they are there to serve the people, not themselves or some foreign entity. We do NOT have to submit. They do NOT own us. We are NOT their chattel. The choice is up to each and every one of us, not somebody else. You want freedom? Demand it, fight for it, or die under the heel on your neck.
Recently I saw the NSW gov have given developers the rights to exceed a local areas height limit by 30%. Sydney is already an alienating ghetto of glass and concrete monstrosities. It is soulless, cold and dystopian. How do people think a baby being born into this or a child growing up in this is normal? This living is anti-human, anti-culture, anti-happiness and the furthest thing from what Australia should be.
Brilliant and comprehensive capture of the current situation in Australia. Thank you Dear Josie for pointing out the things that so many of us wanted not to see. Jacinta Price has been the only real voice of good sense in Parliament on this issue, but I am saddened to hear that our expectations in this regard are likely to prove illusory. This will break the heart of many Australians to comprehend this about Senator Jacinta Price. I am myself almost in tears learning of it. As always, Dear Josie you are a Leader of our future and will tell us not only the truth of it, but the very hard unpopular truths that even those of us who welcome and appreciate it, at times struggle to hear. Thank you. God Bless you and why oh why do I so often believe that you may be the only person who is actually fit to Lead this Country out of a nosedive into the abyss and misery of a future as a United Nations vassal state of tax slaves with far worse than we have endured in yet ahead of us!
The one comment I would make in respect of s.51(xxix) of the Constitution is however that no competent legal construction of our Constitution can read any one of the limited grants of conditional authorities so as to be repugnant to the essential objects of the foundational Natural Law Jurisprudence. This is what their abject abuse of s.51(xxix) purports to do, to read the limited and conditional grant of authority in a way that allows it to effectively ignore basic and fundamental constitutional construction.
Firstly, the Constitution preamble creates an "indissoluble Federal Commonwealth" under the structural framework of the Crown of the UK and vitally "under the Constitution". That is, the nature of our Representative Democracy in the structural framework of a Constitutional Monarchy is based upon the adopted legal principles and conventions which support our unique government in Australia.
The fact that the People of Australia became Sovereign over a mere public service governmental framework at Federation was a reiteration that from that time forward that no person or persons could attempt to undertake any Constitutionally valid actions which would attempt to infringe, erode or deny the "indissoluble" nature of the Federal Commonwealth that all Australian People created at Federation in perpetuity. As such, any "enlargement" of the narrow way in which the mere limited and conditional authority to any or all public servants to reject our "indissoluble Federal Commonwealth" in any manner to deny the Sovereignty of Australian People is blatantly Unconstitutional. As I have maintained for decades, the practice of mere public servants in the executive purporting to "sign Australians up" for any treaties which infringe, erode or deny the full operation of our Australian Constitution. This includes the full and proper operation of our Inalienable Natural Rights as enshrined in our foundational Natural Law Jurisprudence.
The States and Federal public servants have ignored the operation of clause 5 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act which contains but is distinct from the Australian Constitution which is contained therein. Many decades of entirely inadequate Constitutional teachings in our Australian Universities have led to very few senior Judges in our highest courts even being able to competently construct and interpret the Constitution, and when they do they so often omit to reflect upon those pesky implied essential foundational principles such as the "common good". So often they mindlessly or corruptly simply follow totalitarian civil law legal systems and fail to distinguish between the "common good" required by our Constitution, and the totalitarian legal positivist foreign principle of the "greater good".
The sad fact is that we no longer even have the Judges who trained competently in our Australian Constitution, as most of them never studied the essential World renowned works of our own undisputed Jurisprudence legal genius Professor Julius Stone. They are ignorant of the foundational Natural Law Jurisprudence and are unfamiliar with its profound wisdom teachings. Most of them could not tell you what the relevance of the Suma Theologica of the classic wisdom teachings of Thomas Aquinas the greatest justice scholar devoted his life to handing down to future generations.
I am a classical Australian Constitutional scholar of many generations. I know well that these essential works of Professor Julius Stone were withheld from them at the insistence of the United Nations infiltration of our Australian Universities.
However, it is an inescapable fact of basic statutory construction that they should ignore the opening words of s.51 and place no worth on the words "shall" the phrase "subject to this Constitution" and follow the idiocy of a failed former judge and UN indoctrinate who saw fit to attribute no meaning to the rich and meaning packed phrase "for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth". This is to weaponize the very Australian Constitution we Australians voted into being, and to contort its meaning in ways that are patently perverse to achieve the very infringement, erosion and denial of our Natural Law Jurisprudence and the "common good" in ways that were within the meaning of criminal subversion in years gone by.
Their answer was to remove the criminal laws against criminal subversion.
However, for those who are entrusted to make our laws and those entrusted to uphold our laws in the highest Judicial Offices in Australia to ignore our criminal laws - s.80.1AC(c)(i) Treachery and/or s. 80.2(1) (a)(i) and at times (a)(ii) and/or (iii) - Urging violence against the Constitution; and s.83.4 interference with political rights and duties is simply put, criminal.
What gets me, even here in the states, is we supposedly live under the rule of law and our constitution and founding documents. Just because some idiots with god complexes get in and trash these documents doesn’t mean we, the people have to go along with something violating said founding documents. Why not throw these bums out by any means possible, tell them to go to hell, and make sure those backfilling the vacated offices know they are there to serve the people, not themselves or some foreign entity. We do NOT have to submit. They do NOT own us. We are NOT their chattel. The choice is up to each and every one of us, not somebody else. You want freedom? Demand it, fight for it, or die under the heel on your neck.
Recently I saw the NSW gov have given developers the rights to exceed a local areas height limit by 30%. Sydney is already an alienating ghetto of glass and concrete monstrosities. It is soulless, cold and dystopian. How do people think a baby being born into this or a child growing up in this is normal? This living is anti-human, anti-culture, anti-happiness and the furthest thing from what Australia should be.
Brilliant and comprehensive capture of the current situation in Australia. Thank you Dear Josie for pointing out the things that so many of us wanted not to see. Jacinta Price has been the only real voice of good sense in Parliament on this issue, but I am saddened to hear that our expectations in this regard are likely to prove illusory. This will break the heart of many Australians to comprehend this about Senator Jacinta Price. I am myself almost in tears learning of it. As always, Dear Josie you are a Leader of our future and will tell us not only the truth of it, but the very hard unpopular truths that even those of us who welcome and appreciate it, at times struggle to hear. Thank you. God Bless you and why oh why do I so often believe that you may be the only person who is actually fit to Lead this Country out of a nosedive into the abyss and misery of a future as a United Nations vassal state of tax slaves with far worse than we have endured in yet ahead of us!
The one comment I would make in respect of s.51(xxix) of the Constitution is however that no competent legal construction of our Constitution can read any one of the limited grants of conditional authorities so as to be repugnant to the essential objects of the foundational Natural Law Jurisprudence. This is what their abject abuse of s.51(xxix) purports to do, to read the limited and conditional grant of authority in a way that allows it to effectively ignore basic and fundamental constitutional construction.
Firstly, the Constitution preamble creates an "indissoluble Federal Commonwealth" under the structural framework of the Crown of the UK and vitally "under the Constitution". That is, the nature of our Representative Democracy in the structural framework of a Constitutional Monarchy is based upon the adopted legal principles and conventions which support our unique government in Australia.
The fact that the People of Australia became Sovereign over a mere public service governmental framework at Federation was a reiteration that from that time forward that no person or persons could attempt to undertake any Constitutionally valid actions which would attempt to infringe, erode or deny the "indissoluble" nature of the Federal Commonwealth that all Australian People created at Federation in perpetuity. As such, any "enlargement" of the narrow way in which the mere limited and conditional authority to any or all public servants to reject our "indissoluble Federal Commonwealth" in any manner to deny the Sovereignty of Australian People is blatantly Unconstitutional. As I have maintained for decades, the practice of mere public servants in the executive purporting to "sign Australians up" for any treaties which infringe, erode or deny the full operation of our Australian Constitution. This includes the full and proper operation of our Inalienable Natural Rights as enshrined in our foundational Natural Law Jurisprudence.
The States and Federal public servants have ignored the operation of clause 5 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act which contains but is distinct from the Australian Constitution which is contained therein. Many decades of entirely inadequate Constitutional teachings in our Australian Universities have led to very few senior Judges in our highest courts even being able to competently construct and interpret the Constitution, and when they do they so often omit to reflect upon those pesky implied essential foundational principles such as the "common good". So often they mindlessly or corruptly simply follow totalitarian civil law legal systems and fail to distinguish between the "common good" required by our Constitution, and the totalitarian legal positivist foreign principle of the "greater good".
The sad fact is that we no longer even have the Judges who trained competently in our Australian Constitution, as most of them never studied the essential World renowned works of our own undisputed Jurisprudence legal genius Professor Julius Stone. They are ignorant of the foundational Natural Law Jurisprudence and are unfamiliar with its profound wisdom teachings. Most of them could not tell you what the relevance of the Suma Theologica of the classic wisdom teachings of Thomas Aquinas the greatest justice scholar devoted his life to handing down to future generations.
I am a classical Australian Constitutional scholar of many generations. I know well that these essential works of Professor Julius Stone were withheld from them at the insistence of the United Nations infiltration of our Australian Universities.
However, it is an inescapable fact of basic statutory construction that they should ignore the opening words of s.51 and place no worth on the words "shall" the phrase "subject to this Constitution" and follow the idiocy of a failed former judge and UN indoctrinate who saw fit to attribute no meaning to the rich and meaning packed phrase "for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth". This is to weaponize the very Australian Constitution we Australians voted into being, and to contort its meaning in ways that are patently perverse to achieve the very infringement, erosion and denial of our Natural Law Jurisprudence and the "common good" in ways that were within the meaning of criminal subversion in years gone by.
Their answer was to remove the criminal laws against criminal subversion.
However, for those who are entrusted to make our laws and those entrusted to uphold our laws in the highest Judicial Offices in Australia to ignore our criminal laws - s.80.1AC(c)(i) Treachery and/or s. 80.2(1) (a)(i) and at times (a)(ii) and/or (iii) - Urging violence against the Constitution; and s.83.4 interference with political rights and duties is simply put, criminal.