Keating's "Indigenous land rights" provides globalists with 80% of Australia to asset strip

United Nations conventions view indigenous rights as collective laying the basis for an end to Australian homeownership.

Experts estimate that within ten years by 2030, up to 80% of the Australian land mass will be under Native Title, a collective property title system designed by the United Nations, not the Australian people.

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/596ef6aec534a5c54429ed9e/t/5c9d80b6f9619a37d3256bf9/1553825978706/vol24chap8.pdf, p.85,

Decades of betrayal by those in positions of power using indigenous issues in pursuit of their goal of overthrowing the Australian nation for their international handlers drooling over our natural resources resulted in the native title land system.

An associate of Marcia Langton’s ANU Professor Jon Altman knows all about this treasonist plot, Altman says: the native land title system provides an opportunity for real utopias to be envisioned on Indigenous lands for those fortunate enough to repossess them.

http://maorilawreview.co.nz/2014/03/the-political-ecology-and-political-economy-of-the-indigenous-land-revolution-in-australia/

---

The Native Title Act was designed at the United Nations, after which Paul Keating pushed the Native Title Act through the Australian parliament in consultation with five Aboriginal people:

1. Lowitja O'Donoghue,

2. Noel Pearson,

3. Sol Bellear,

4. Marcia Langton and

5. David Ross.

   ---

What is Native Title?

From an economic perspective, Native Title has provided Aboriginal people with no independence. Simultaneously, mining titles which previously gave rights have now been diminished.

Native Title land is not transferable, which means the land cannot be sold or mortgaged. Native Title has proven useless to Aboriginal people, and the uncertainty it creates makes it difficult to attract investors.

Unfortunately, Native Title is best described as a colossal failure of common sense. Well, after all, they create the problems for their pre-planned solutions.

With Native Title being designed at the United Nations, they found five failed crooked hand selected Aboriginal leaders to rubber stamp Keating’s Native Title legislation and as instructed they automatically approved it without proper consideration of the voices of indigenous Australians, these were the only ones consulted, mentioned above, those invited to discuss the Native Title Act with Prime Minister Paul Keating are the same group that designed the Uluru Voice and frequent the United Nations funded out of the taxpayers pocket.

There was no adequate consultation process. Aboriginal communities must live with the consequences, and none of them can be described as sensible and the same occurs with The Uluru Voice consultations. This might be shocking, history provides an important context for future acts, and when criminals get away with crimes they repeat them, just like history repeats, and sadly we have been betrayed again, elders were not consulted and they do not want the Voice to proceed. This time they must not get away with it or we will lose this nation, our home.

Native Title is effectively a communist title with no personal private property rights. Supporting this view the Communist Party of Australia in a paper from Native Title to Land Rights in 1998 concurred:

It’s not a question of “helping” or “supporting” Aborigines. It’s a matter of solidarity in the common struggle. Aboriginal land rights challenge capitalism. They are a significant element in the struggle for socialism and lay the basis for the transition to social ownership by all the people, black and white, of land and other resources in a socialist Australia.

I note that this article disappeared online for some reason, download it here: https://josephinecashman.com.au/references

The United Nations Native Title:

Part of Papua New Guinea before 1847 the Torres Strait Islanders have nothing in common with aboriginal people on mainland Australia and the Mabo judgment concerns only Torres Strait Islander peoples and culture, despite this the Mabo High Court judgment was used as a device to push native title across Australia.

Robert Tickner was Keating's Aboriginal Affairs Minister and after the Mabo judgment, he got straight on a plane to Geneva.

The Department of Foreign Affairs online book claims to be the authoritative single volume appraisal of Australia's engagement with the United Nations and declares:

…In Geneva, only a few weeks after the (Mabo) High Court decision was handed down the Aboriginal Torres Strait Islander Affairs Minister Robert Tickner passed copies of the decision to the UN Working Group on Indigenous Populations: (Robert Tickner) noting that the court had finally put an end to offensive and essentially racist notion of terra nullius.

https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/Pages/australia-and-the-united-nations

Despite the fact that Terra Nullius is an Algerian term and not the legal basis upon which Australia was settled, I digress,

In summary, the Mabo judgment comes out,

No one knew it was going to cover the mainland.

Then Robert Tickner gets on a plane and hands out the judgment, and Lowitja O'Donoghue the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC) Chair was there, and they draft the native title legislation at the UN.

This is why Keating consulted with only 5 failed aboriginal leaders, the plan was prearranged and in place,

Ālea iacta est, the die is cast, he'd made his play and there was no going back.

Robert Tickner is now saying the indigenous voice to parliament can't fail.

---

You understand how dangerous the Uluru Voice is…

By exposing the traitors,

We will stop the voice of tyranny.